PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MITT vs. IVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MITT vs. IVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) and Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MITT achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly lower than IVR's 2.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MITT has outperformed IVR with an annualized return of -6.83%, while IVR has yielded a comparatively lower -11.60% annualized return.


MITT

1D
0.76%
1M
5.03%
YTD
-3.68%
6M
-4.36%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
21.43%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
-6.83%

IVR

1D
-0.62%
1M
2.83%
YTD
2.32%
6M
1.70%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
-13.59%
10Y*
-11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MITT vs. IVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MITT
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
-3.68%42.79%17.10%35.77%-41.03%24.12%-80.68%8.94%-6.22%23.62%
IVR
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
2.32%24.87%9.03%-14.30%-44.56%-9.34%-72.54%28.97%-6.81%34.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MITT and IVR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2011

0.61

The correlation between MITT and IVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MITT:

$1.09

IVR:

$1.64

PE Ratio

MITT:

7.29

IVR:

4.87

PS Ratio

MITT:

0.50

IVR:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

MITT:

$492.91M

IVR:

$215.91M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MITT:

$464.48M

IVR:

$138.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

MITT:

$457.33M

IVR:

$246.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MITT vs. IVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MITT
MITT Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IVR
IVR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVR Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MITT vs. IVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) and Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MITTIVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.23

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

1.74

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.29

4.65

-2.36

MITT vs. IVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MITT Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the IVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MITT and IVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MITT vs. IVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MITT drawdown since its inception was -91.49%, roughly equal to the maximum IVR drawdown of -92.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MITT and IVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MITTIVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.49%

-92.55%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.74%

-16.54%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.77%

-45.38%

+19.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.76%

-76.67%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.49%

-92.55%

+1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.38%

-84.98%

+13.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.78%

-35.94%

-2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.68%

6.19%

+2.49%

Volatility

MITT vs. IVR - Volatility Comparison

AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) at 4.84%. This indicates that MITT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MITTIVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

4.84%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.25%

17.50%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.82%

22.56%

+5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.21%

35.33%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.65%

56.15%

+11.50%

Dividends

MITT vs. IVR - Dividend Comparison

MITT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.21%, less than IVR's 20.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVR
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
20.50%16.41%19.88%25.40%26.32%12.59%31.66%11.11%14.95%9.14%10.96%13.72%
MITT
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
11.21%9.98%11.28%11.34%15.25%7.90%1.02%12.32%12.40%10.52%11.10%17.72%

Financials

MITT vs. IVR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. and Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-200.00M-100.00M0.00100.00M20222023202420252026
130.09M
0
(MITT) Total Revenue
(IVR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MITT and IVR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MITT has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to IVR (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MITT dropped -91.49% vs IVR's -92.55%.

IVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MITT and IVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer