PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MITT vs. CHMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MITT vs. CHMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation (CHMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MITT achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly higher than CHMI's -4.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MITT has underperformed CHMI with an annualized return of -6.83%, while CHMI has yielded a comparatively higher -5.20% annualized return.


MITT

1D
0.76%
1M
5.03%
YTD
-3.68%
6M
-4.36%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
21.43%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
-6.83%

CHMI

1D
-1.27%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
-4.91%
6M
-4.25%
1Y
-5.51%
3Y*
-7.48%
5Y*
-12.58%
10Y*
-5.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MITT vs. CHMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MITT
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
-3.68%42.79%17.10%35.77%-41.03%24.12%-80.68%8.94%-6.22%23.62%
CHMI
Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation
-4.91%14.92%-21.94%-18.91%-17.19%1.54%-28.09%-6.76%9.80%10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MITT and CHMI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013

0.48

The correlation between MITT and CHMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.52 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MITT:

$252.00M

CHMI:

$85.26M

EPS

MITT:

$1.09

CHMI:

$0.61

PE Ratio

MITT:

7.29

CHMI:

3.84

PS Ratio

MITT:

0.50

CHMI:

1.91

PB Ratio

MITT:

0.78

CHMI:

0.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

MITT:

$492.91M

CHMI:

$43.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MITT:

$464.48M

CHMI:

$35.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

MITT:

$457.33M

CHMI:

$38.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MITT vs. CHMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MITT
MITT Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CHMI
CHMI Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CHMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHMI Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CHMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHMI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MITT vs. CHMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation (CHMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MITTCHMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.00

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

-0.22

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.29

-0.53

+2.82

MITT vs. CHMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MITT Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the CHMI Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MITT and CHMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MITT vs. CHMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MITT drawdown since its inception was -91.49%, which is greater than CHMI's maximum drawdown of -81.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MITT and CHMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MITTCHMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.49%

-81.93%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.74%

-24.83%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.77%

-40.96%

+15.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.76%

-61.98%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.49%

-81.93%

-9.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.38%

-63.70%

-7.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.78%

-28.64%

-10.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.68%

10.48%

-1.80%

Volatility

MITT vs. CHMI - Volatility Comparison

AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation (CHMI) have volatilities of 6.80% and 6.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MITTCHMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

6.74%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.25%

19.96%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.82%

31.48%

-3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.21%

32.35%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.65%

42.88%

+24.77%

Dividends

MITT vs. CHMI - Dividend Comparison

MITT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.21%, less than CHMI's 19.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHMI
Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation
19.31%19.61%22.73%17.82%18.62%13.06%13.24%12.20%12.03%10.89%11.60%15.23%
MITT
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
11.21%9.98%11.28%11.34%15.25%7.90%1.02%12.32%12.40%10.52%11.10%17.72%

Financials

MITT vs. CHMI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M20222023202420252026
130.09M
0
(MITT) Total Revenue
(CHMI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MITT and CHMI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MITT has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to CHMI (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MITT dropped -91.49% vs CHMI's -81.93%.

MITT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MITT and CHMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer