MITK vs. FTNT
MITK (Mitek Systems, Inc.) and FTNT (Fortinet, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MITK in Software - Application, FTNT in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past 10 years, MITK returned 7.57%/yr vs 35.70%/yr for FTNT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MITK vs. FTNT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MITK achieves a 53.36% return, which is significantly lower than FTNT's 84.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MITK has underperformed FTNT with an annualized return of 7.57%, while FTNT has yielded a comparatively higher 35.70% annualized return.
MITK
- 1D
- -7.91%
- 1M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 53.36%
- 6M
- 75.11%
- 1Y
- 71.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- -0.71%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
FTNT
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 64.14%
- YTD
- 84.46%
- 6M
- 76.99%
- 1Y
- 42.38%
- 3Y*
- 29.07%
- 5Y*
- 26.99%
- 10Y*
- 35.70%
MITK vs. FTNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MITK Mitek Systems, Inc. | 53.36% | -5.21% | -14.65% | 34.57% | -45.41% | -0.17% | 132.42% | -29.23% | 20.78% | 45.53% |
FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 84.46% | -15.95% | 61.42% | 19.72% | -31.98% | 141.97% | 39.13% | 51.58% | 61.20% | 45.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between MITK and FTNT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2009 | 0.23 |
The correlation between MITK and FTNT shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MITK:
$785.30M
FTNT:
$108.81B
MITK:
$0.35
FTNT:
$2.58
MITK:
46.37
FTNT:
56.88
MITK:
1.08
FTNT:
1.58
MITK:
4.05
FTNT:
15.64
MITK:
3.28
FTNT:
109.94
MITK:
$189.59M
FTNT:
$7.11B
MITK:
$166.84M
FTNT:
$5.74B
MITK:
$43.01M
FTNT:
$2.47B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MITK vs. FTNT — Risk / Return Rank
MITK
FTNT
MITK vs. FTNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitek Systems, Inc. (MITK) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MITK | FTNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 0.95 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 1.44 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.23 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 1.38 | +2.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.99 | 2.02 | +6.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MITK | FTNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 0.95 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.62 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.88 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.75 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
MITK vs. FTNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MITK drawdown since its inception was -99.67%, which is greater than FTNT's maximum drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MITK and FTNT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MITK | FTNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.67% | -51.20% | -48.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.01% | -30.90% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.06% | -38.32% | -13.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.13% | -38.32% | -30.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.13% | -38.32% | -30.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.74% | -1.60% | -28.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.40% | -16.25% | -49.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | 21.06% | -13.13% |
Volatility
MITK vs. FTNT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mitek Systems, Inc. (MITK) is 16.44%, while Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) has a volatility of 20.64%. This indicates that MITK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MITK | FTNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.44% | 20.64% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.24% | 31.59% | +10.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.21% | 44.81% | +4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.28% | 43.88% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.14% | 40.84% | +6.30% |
Dividends
MITK vs. FTNT - Dividend Comparison
Neither MITK nor FTNT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MITK vs. FTNT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitek Systems, Inc. and Fortinet, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MITK vs. FTNT - Profitability Comparison
MITK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitek Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.81M and revenue of 54.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.9%.
FTNT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortinet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.3%.
MITK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitek Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.55M and revenue of 54.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.
FTNT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortinet, Inc. reported an operating income of 580.00M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.4%.
MITK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitek Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 9.54M and revenue of 54.84M, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
FTNT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortinet, Inc. reported a net income of 534.50M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MITK and FTNT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTNT has higher volatility (20.64%) compared to MITK (16.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MITK dropped -99.67% vs FTNT's -51.20%.
MITK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MITK and FTNT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer