MIST.L vs. STEA.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

MIST.L (PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation) and STEA.L (PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - MIST.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation, while STEA.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIST.L returned 3.14%/yr vs 2.92%/yr for STEA.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MIST.L vs. STEA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L) and PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc (STEA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MIST.L is traded in GBP, while STEA.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the STEA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIST.L achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than STEA.L's -2.06% return.

MIST.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 2.06%
• YTD: 2.23%
• 1Y: 4.37%
• 3Y*: 5.04%
• 5Y*: 3.14%
• 10Y*: —

STEA.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.93%
• 6M: -1.49%
• YTD: -2.06%
• 1Y: 1.94%
• 3Y*: 5.82%
• 5Y*: 2.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIST.L vs. STEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MIST.L PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation	2.23%	4.61%	5.53%	5.01%	-1.12%	-0.36%	0.63%	0.28%
STEA.L PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc	-2.06%	12.29%	1.80%	6.97%	-2.10%	-2.70%	7.22%	-3.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MIST.L and STEA.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2019	0.09

Return for Risk

MIST.L vs. STEA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIST.L

MIST.L Risk / Return Rank: 100
MIST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MIST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MIST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MIST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MIST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100

STEA.L

STEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 45
STEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
STEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
STEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
STEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
STEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIST.L vs. STEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L) and PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc (STEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIST.L	STEA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	11.58	0.36	+11.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	35.35	0.54	+34.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	7.17	1.06	+6.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	101.64	0.67	+100.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	493.90	1.77	+492.12

MIST.L vs. STEA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIST.L Sharpe Ratio is 11.58, which is higher than the STEA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIST.L and STEA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIST.L vs. STEA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIST.L drawdown since its inception was -3.70%, smaller than the maximum STEA.L drawdown of -21.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIST.L and STEA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIST.L	STEA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-21.02%	+17.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.04%	-2.67%	+2.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.20%	-2.97%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.45%	-10.92%	+8.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.55%	+2.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.38%	-3.74%	+3.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	1.01%	-1.00%

Volatility

MIST.L vs. STEA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L) is 0.10%, while PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc (STEA.L) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that MIST.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STEA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIST.L	STEA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.10%	1.08%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.28%	3.75%	-3.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38%	5.05%	-4.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.58%	7.04%	-6.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.98%	8.33%	-7.35%

Dividends

MIST.L vs. STEA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MIST.L nor STEA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIST.L and STEA.L in my portfolio?

MIST.L and STEA.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between MIST.L and STEA.L?

MIST.L is categorized as Global Equities, while STEA.L is High Yield Bonds. MIST.L tracks PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation, while STEA.L tracks PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc.