PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MISSX vs. MFEKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MISSX vs. MFEKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund (MISSX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MISSX achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than MFEKX's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MISSX has underperformed MFEKX with an annualized return of 1.67%, while MFEKX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.62% annualized return.


MISSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.97%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.28%
1Y
7.87%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
1.67%

MFEKX

1D
-1.27%
1M
3.17%
YTD
4.99%
6M
4.37%
1Y
15.48%
3Y*
26.14%
5Y*
13.85%
10Y*
17.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MISSX vs. MFEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MISSX
MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund
1.87%4.94%1.62%4.40%-10.37%1.95%4.25%6.82%1.04%4.07%
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
4.99%12.44%49.62%36.27%-31.07%23.71%31.77%37.82%2.40%30.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MISSX and MFEKX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2011

-0.03

The correlation between MISSX and MFEKX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MISSX vs. MFEKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MISSX
MISSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MISSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MISSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MISSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MISSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MISSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MFEKX
MFEKX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MFEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MISSX vs. MFEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund (MISSX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MISSXMFEKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.18

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

0.95

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.06

3.08

+5.99

MISSX vs. MFEKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MISSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the MFEKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MISSX and MFEKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MISSXMFEKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.03

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.64

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.83

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.87

+0.24

Drawdowns

MISSX vs. MFEKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MISSX drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, smaller than the maximum MFEKX drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISSX and MFEKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MISSXMFEKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-36.06%

+20.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-17.27%

+14.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.56%

-23.22%

+16.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.13%

-36.06%

+20.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.13%

-36.06%

+20.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.60%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-5.64%

+3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

5.30%

-4.40%

Volatility

MISSX vs. MFEKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund (MISSX) is 1.24%, while MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that MISSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MISSXMFEKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

3.87%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.34%

12.30%

-9.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

15.88%

-12.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.29%

21.89%

-17.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.12%

21.20%

-17.08%

MISSX vs. MFEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MISSX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MFEKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MISSX vs. MFEKX - Dividend Comparison

MISSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than MFEKX's 14.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
14.12%14.82%25.31%4.82%1.04%2.74%3.55%1.57%3.88%2.49%1.70%3.64%
MISSX
MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund
3.40%4.40%2.74%2.24%1.81%1.93%2.40%3.25%3.23%3.27%3.47%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


MISSX and MFEKX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEKX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to MISSX (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MISSX dropped -15.13% vs MFEKX's -36.06%.

MISSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MISSX and MFEKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer