PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MISSX vs. MDIJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MISSX vs. MDIJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund (MISSX) and MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MISSX achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than MDIJX's 11.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MISSX has underperformed MDIJX with an annualized return of 1.42%, while MDIJX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.74% annualized return.


MISSX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-2.23%
6M
-0.07%
YTD
0.44%
1Y
6.11%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
1.42%
ALL TIME*
4.00%

MDIJX

1D
2.59%
1M
1.88%
6M
5.93%
YTD
11.35%
1Y
22.92%
3Y*
15.16%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
9.74%
ALL TIME*
8.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MISSX vs. MDIJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MISSX
MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund
0.44%4.94%1.62%4.40%-10.37%1.95%4.25%6.82%1.04%4.07%
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
11.35%27.84%6.41%14.37%-17.12%7.69%15.26%26.00%-11.05%30.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MISSX and MDIJX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004

-0.04

The correlation between MISSX and MDIJX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MISSX vs. MDIJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MISSX
MISSX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MISSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MISSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MISSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MISSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MISSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MDIJX
MDIJX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MDIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MISSX vs. MDIJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund (MISSX) and MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MISSXMDIJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.29

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.85

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

6.94

+1.10

MISSX vs. MDIJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MISSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the MDIJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MISSX and MDIJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MISSX vs. MDIJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MISSX drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, smaller than the maximum MDIJX drawdown of -56.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISSX and MDIJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MISSXMDIJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-56.60%

+41.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-11.40%

+8.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.55%

-12.57%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.13%

-30.19%

+15.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.13%

-30.19%

+15.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

0.00%

-2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-9.04%

+7.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

3.04%

-2.14%

Volatility

MISSX vs. MDIJX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund (MISSX) is 1.11%, while MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that MISSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDIJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MISSXMDIJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

4.13%

-3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.58%

11.70%

-9.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28%

13.59%

-10.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.32%

14.42%

-10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.12%

14.54%

-10.42%

MISSX vs. MDIJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MISSX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MDIJX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

MISSX vs. MDIJX - Dividend Comparison

MISSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than MDIJX's 4.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
4.64%5.17%3.50%4.14%2.64%2.70%1.64%2.50%3.14%1.63%2.18%1.69%
MISSX
MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund
3.18%4.40%2.74%2.24%1.81%1.93%2.40%3.25%3.23%3.27%3.47%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


MISSX and MDIJX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDIJX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to MISSX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MISSX dropped -15.13% vs MDIJX's -56.60%.

MISSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MISSX and MDIJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer