PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MISL vs. NATO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MISL vs. NATO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MISL vs. NATO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MISL
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF
6.94%41.24%20.48%9.77%
NATO.L
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating
6.72%54.83%31.99%16.64%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MISL having a 6.94% return and NATO.L slightly lower at 6.72%.


MISL

1D
2.28%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
6.94%
6M
9.60%
1Y
51.50%
3Y*
27.55%
5Y*
10Y*

NATO.L

1D
4.55%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
6.72%
6M
0.42%
1Y
36.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MISL vs. NATO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MISL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than NATO.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MISL vs. NATO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MISL
MISL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MISL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MISL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MISL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MISL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MISL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

NATO.L
NATO.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NATO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MISL vs. NATO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MISLNATO.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

1.61

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.87

2.27

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.86

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.29

7.82

+4.47

MISL vs. NATO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MISL Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the NATO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MISL and NATO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MISLNATO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.61

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

1.44

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between MISL and NATO.L is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MISL vs. NATO.L - Dividend Comparison

MISL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while NATO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
MISL
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.36%0.40%0.74%0.63%0.08%
NATO.L
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MISL vs. NATO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MISL drawdown since its inception was -17.91%, smaller than the maximum NATO.L drawdown of -21.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISL and NATO.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MISLNATO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.91%

-21.84%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.45%

-12.79%

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.30%

-6.04%

-4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-2.45%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

4.68%

-0.48%

Volatility

MISL vs. NATO.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) have volatilities of 8.47% and 8.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MISLNATO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

8.08%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.76%

15.61%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.09%

22.55%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.70%

27.88%

-9.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

27.88%

-9.18%