MISGX vs. FGROX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

MISGX (Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund) and FGROX (Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MISGX returned 9.23%/yr vs 16.68%/yr for FGROX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MISGX charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FGROX.

Performance

MISGX vs. FGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund (MISGX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MISGX achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly lower than FGROX's 32.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MISGX has underperformed FGROX with an annualized return of 9.23%, while FGROX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.68% annualized return.

MISGX

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 5.59%
• 6M: 3.30%
• 1Y: 12.53%
• 3Y*: 7.79%
• 5Y*: -0.80%
• 10Y*: 9.23%

FGROX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 5.97%
• YTD: 32.77%
• 6M: 27.88%
• 1Y: 69.27%
• 3Y*: 31.75%
• 5Y*: 12.73%
• 10Y*: 16.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MISGX vs. FGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MISGX Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund	5.59%	-1.28%	13.89%	14.02%	-24.63%	8.55%	27.78%	18.96%	0.40%	22.83%
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	32.77%	31.85%	20.04%	19.04%	-24.42%	3.91%	38.92%	28.71%	-11.85%	28.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MISGX and FGROX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2013	0.86

The correlation between MISGX and FGROX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MISGX vs. FGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MISGX

MISGX Risk / Return Rank: 12
MISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
MISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
MISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
MISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
MISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

FGROX

FGROX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MISGX vs. FGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund (MISGX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MISGX	FGROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	2.63	-1.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	3.28	-2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.41	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	4.86	-3.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.78	20.27	-17.49

MISGX vs. FGROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MISGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the FGROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MISGX and FGROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MISGX vs. FGROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MISGX drawdown since its inception was -41.11%, roughly equal to the maximum FGROX drawdown of -41.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISGX and FGROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MISGX	FGROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.11%	-41.48%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.54%	-14.36%	+0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.23%	-28.61%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.70%	-38.52%	+0.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.11%	-41.48%	+0.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.79%	-1.65%	-6.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.28%	-10.22%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.35%	3.42%	+0.93%

Volatility

MISGX vs. FGROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund (MISGX) is 5.46%, while Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that MISGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MISGX	FGROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.46%	9.62%	-4.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.97%	20.44%	-7.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.94%	26.61%	-8.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.44%	25.85%	-4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.24%	25.28%	-4.04%

MISGX vs. FGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MISGX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FGROX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

MISGX vs. FGROX - Dividend Comparison

MISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, less than FGROX's 8.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	8.58%	11.39%	13.92%	5.91%	8.13%	17.87%	8.04%	1.38%	11.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MISGX Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund	7.47%	7.89%	3.76%	0.00%	14.39%	33.08%	1.96%	5.78%	12.50%	4.18%	0.00%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MISGX and FGROX in my portfolio?

MISGX and FGROX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MISGX or FGROX?

FGROX has higher volatility (9.62%) compared to MISGX (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MISGX dropped -41.11% vs FGROX's -41.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.