MIRA vs. GRFS

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MIRA (MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock) and GRFS (Grifols, S.A.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Drug Manufacturers - General industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past year, MIRA returned -48.57% vs -24.76% for GRFS. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

MIRA vs. GRFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock (MIRA) and Grifols, S.A. (GRFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIRA achieves a -47.55% return, which is significantly lower than GRFS's -14.69% return.

MIRA

• 1D: -2.98%
• 1M: -16.17%
• 6M: -36.13%
• YTD: -47.55%
• 1Y: -48.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -51.72%

GRFS

• 1D: -4.02%
• 1M: 9.92%
• 6M: -13.77%
• YTD: -14.69%
• 1Y: -24.76%
• 3Y*: -7.54%
• 5Y*: -11.82%
• 10Y*: -6.06%
• ALL TIME*: 3.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GRFS Grifols, S.A.	$7.99M	$6.47M	$5.41M
MIRA MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock	$48.29K	$55.07K	$96.54K

MIRA vs. GRFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MIRA MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock	-47.55%	32.46%	8.57%	-85.00%
GRFS Grifols, S.A.	-14.69%	27.79%	-35.64%	14.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MIRA and GRFS is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2023	0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap MIRA : $33.28M GRFS : $6.66B
EPS MIRA : -$1.47 GRFS : €0.89
Total Revenue (TTM) MIRA : $0.00 GRFS : €7.43B
Gross Profit (TTM) MIRA : $0.00 GRFS : €2.77B
EBITDA (TTM) MIRA : -$6.93M GRFS : €1.75B

Return for Risk

MIRA vs. GRFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIRA

MIRA Risk / Return Rank: 9
MIRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
MIRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MIRA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
MIRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MIRA Martin Ratio Rank: 4

GRFS

GRFS Risk / Return Rank: 14
GRFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
GRFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
GRFS Omega Ratio Rank: 14
GRFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
GRFS Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIRA vs. GRFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock (MIRA) and Grifols, S.A. (GRFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIRA	GRFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.71	-0.77	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.12	-0.96	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	0.89	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	-0.71	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.61	-1.20	-0.41

MIRA vs. GRFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIRA Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is comparable to the GRFS Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIRA and GRFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIRA vs. GRFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIRA drawdown since its inception was -92.69%, which is greater than GRFS's maximum drawdown of -78.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIRA and GRFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIRA	GRFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.69%	-78.01%	-14.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.00%	-34.08%	-21.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-92.34%	-52.68%	-39.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-65.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-78.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.33%	-67.39%	-21.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.76%	-32.11%	-46.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.46%	20.24%	+12.22%

Volatility

MIRA vs. GRFS - Volatility Comparison

MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock (MIRA) has a higher volatility of 11.44% compared to Grifols, S.A. (GRFS) at 10.35%. This indicates that MIRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIRA	GRFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.44%	10.35%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.16%	24.92%	+22.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.32%	31.49%	+41.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	385.18%	48.92%	+336.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	385.18%	40.35%	+344.83%

Dividends

MIRA vs. GRFS - Dividend Comparison

MIRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRFS Grifols, S.A.	3.43%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.20%	0.83%	1.55%	2.32%	1.24%	1.67%	2.01%
MIRA MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIRA and GRFS in my portfolio?

MIRA and GRFS have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MIRA or GRFS?

MIRA has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to GRFS (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIRA dropped -92.69% vs GRFS's -78.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MIRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.