MINY vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

MINY (YieldMax Strategic Metals & Mining Portfolio Option Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MINY is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund actively managed by YieldMax, while OMAH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MINY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

MINY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Strategic Metals & Mining Portfolio Option Income ETF (MINY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MINY

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -8.85%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 5.98%
• 6M: 5.41%
• 1Y: 11.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MINY YieldMax Strategic Metals & Mining Portfolio Option Income ETF	-16.12%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MINY and OMAH is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2026	0.21

Return for Risk

MINY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 56
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Strategic Metals & Mining Portfolio Option Income ETF (MINY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MINY	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.49	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.09	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.00	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.42	—

Drawdowns

MINY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINY drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINY and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	MINY	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.23%	-11.83%	-7.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.69%	-1.33%	-15.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.28%	-1.27%	-8.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MINY	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.15%	8.05%	+28.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.15%	12.99%	+23.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.15%	12.99%	+23.16%

MINY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

MINY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

MINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.02%, less than OMAH's 13.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
MINY YieldMax Strategic Metals & Mining Portfolio Option Income ETF	11.02%	0.00%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	13.96%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MINY and OMAH in my portfolio?

MINY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MINY or OMAH?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MINY or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MINY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MINY or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 13.96%, compared with 11.02% for MINY.

What is the main difference between MINY and OMAH?

MINY is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while OMAH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for MINY and 0.95% for OMAH.