PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINV.L vs. XDEB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MINV.L having a 1.01% return and XDEB.L slightly higher at 1.04%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MINV.L having a 7.86% annualized return and XDEB.L not far ahead at 7.93%.


MINV.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.83%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.93%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
7.86%

XDEB.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.82%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.90%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
1.01%3.37%12.86%1.50%1.23%15.98%-1.05%18.84%3.17%7.00%
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.04%3.40%13.01%1.49%1.23%16.00%-0.96%18.55%3.44%7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MINV.L and XDEB.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.97

The correlation between MINV.L and XDEB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MINV.L
XDEB.L

Technology

21.3%
20.1%

Financial Services

14.2%
14.0%

Healthcare

13.6%
13.8%

Communication Services

11.9%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
10.9%

Industrials

9.1%
9.2%

Utilities

7.7%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
5.6%

Energy

4.2%
4.5%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.1%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.7%

Technology

MINV.L
21.3%
XDEB.L
20.1%

Financial Services

MINV.L
14.2%
XDEB.L
14.0%

Healthcare

MINV.L
13.6%
XDEB.L
13.8%

Communication Services

MINV.L
11.9%
XDEB.L
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

MINV.L
10.8%
XDEB.L
10.9%

Industrials

MINV.L
9.1%
XDEB.L
9.2%

Utilities

MINV.L
7.7%
XDEB.L
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MINV.L
5.4%
XDEB.L
5.6%

Energy

MINV.L
4.2%
XDEB.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

MINV.L
1.0%
XDEB.L
1.1%

Real Estate

MINV.L
0.7%
XDEB.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINV.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINV.L
MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MINV.LXDEB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.06

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

0.41

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

1.14

-0.04

MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is comparable to the XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINV.L and XDEB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MINV.LXDEB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.33

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.66

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.69

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.78

+0.05

Drawdowns

MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINV.L drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, roughly equal to the maximum XDEB.L drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV.L and XDEB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINV.LXDEB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-19.61%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.31%

-6.39%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

-8.47%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.23%

-10.19%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.38%

-19.61%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-3.52%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-3.50%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.32%

+0.01%

Volatility

MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) have volatilities of 2.55% and 2.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINV.LXDEB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

2.66%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.92%

5.97%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.92%

7.97%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.70%

9.68%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.85%

11.52%

+0.33%

MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MINV.L nor XDEB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MINV.L and XDEB.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XDEB.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MINV.L and 0.25% for XDEB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINV.L and XDEB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer