MINV.L vs. XDEB.L
MINV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) and XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from iShares and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MINV.L returned 7.86%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for XDEB.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MINV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEB.L.
Performance
MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MINV.L having a 1.01% return and XDEB.L slightly higher at 1.04%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MINV.L having a 7.86% annualized return and XDEB.L not far ahead at 7.93%.
MINV.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- 6.54%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
XDEB.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 1.01% | 3.37% | 12.86% | 1.50% | 1.23% | 15.98% | -1.05% | 18.84% | 3.17% | 7.00% |
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 1.04% | 3.40% | 13.01% | 1.49% | 1.23% | 16.00% | -0.96% | 18.55% | 3.44% | 7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINV.L and XDEB.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014 | 0.97 |
The correlation between MINV.L and XDEB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MINV.L
XDEB.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
MINV.L
XDEB.L
Financial Services
MINV.L
XDEB.L
Healthcare
MINV.L
XDEB.L
Communication Services
MINV.L
XDEB.L
Consumer Defensive
MINV.L
XDEB.L
Industrials
MINV.L
XDEB.L
Utilities
MINV.L
XDEB.L
Consumer Cyclical
MINV.L
XDEB.L
Energy
MINV.L
XDEB.L
Basic Materials
MINV.L
XDEB.L
Real Estate
MINV.L
XDEB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINV.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank
MINV.L
XDEB.L
MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MINV.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | 1.14 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MINV.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.33 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.66 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.69 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.78 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINV.L drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, roughly equal to the maximum XDEB.L drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV.L and XDEB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINV.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -19.61% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.31% | -6.39% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.47% | -8.47% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.23% | -10.19% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.38% | -19.61% | -0.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.60% | -3.52% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -3.50% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.32% | +0.01% |
Volatility
MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) have volatilities of 2.55% and 2.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINV.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 2.66% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.92% | 5.97% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.92% | 7.97% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.70% | 9.68% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 11.52% | +0.33% |
MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MINV.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MINV.L nor XDEB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, MINV.L and XDEB.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XDEB.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEB.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MINV.L and 0.25% for XDEB.L.
Find the right allocation for MINV.L and XDEB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer