MINV.L vs. IMV.L
MINV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) and IMV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS) are both exchange-traded funds - MINV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IMV.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MINV.L returned 7.86%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for IMV.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MINV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IMV.L.
Performance
MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINV.L achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than IMV.L's 4.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MINV.L having a 7.86% annualized return and IMV.L not far behind at 7.68%.
MINV.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- 6.54%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
IMV.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 8.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 1.01% | 3.37% | 12.86% | 1.50% | 1.23% | 15.98% | -1.05% | 18.84% | 3.17% | 7.00% |
IMV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS | 4.72% | 17.66% | 6.63% | 8.56% | -7.83% | 13.68% | 1.50% | 16.37% | -2.91% | 13.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINV.L and IMV.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013 | 0.71 |
The correlation between MINV.L and IMV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.72 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MINV.L
IMV.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
MINV.L
IMV.L
Financial Services
MINV.L
IMV.L
Healthcare
MINV.L
IMV.L
Communication Services
MINV.L
IMV.L
Consumer Defensive
MINV.L
IMV.L
Industrials
MINV.L
IMV.L
Utilities
MINV.L
IMV.L
Consumer Cyclical
MINV.L
IMV.L
Energy
MINV.L
IMV.L
Basic Materials
MINV.L
IMV.L
Real Estate
MINV.L
IMV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINV.L vs. IMV.L — Risk / Return Rank
MINV.L
IMV.L
MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MINV.L | IMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.97 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | 2.92 | -1.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MINV.L | IMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.91 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.69 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.62 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.71 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINV.L drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum IMV.L drawdown of -24.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV.L and IMV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINV.L | IMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -24.48% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.31% | -8.50% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.47% | -8.50% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.23% | -17.42% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.38% | -24.48% | +4.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.60% | -4.62% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -3.57% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.83% | -0.50% |
Volatility
MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) is 2.55%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that MINV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINV.L | IMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 2.89% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.92% | 7.71% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.92% | 9.13% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.70% | 10.97% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 12.31% | -0.46% |
MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IMV.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MINV.L nor IMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MINV.L and IMV.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IMV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IMV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.
MINV.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IMV.L is Europe Equities. MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MINV.L and 0.25% for IMV.L.
Find the right allocation for MINV.L and IMV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer