PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINV.L vs. IMV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINV.L achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than IMV.L's 4.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MINV.L having a 7.86% annualized return and IMV.L not far behind at 7.68%.


MINV.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.83%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.93%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
7.86%

IMV.L

1D
0.51%
1M
1.21%
YTD
4.72%
6M
5.90%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
1.01%3.37%12.86%1.50%1.23%15.98%-1.05%18.84%3.17%7.00%
IMV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS
4.72%17.66%6.63%8.56%-7.83%13.68%1.50%16.37%-2.91%13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MINV.L and IMV.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.71

The correlation between MINV.L and IMV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.72 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MINV.L
IMV.L

Technology

21.3%
2.8%

Financial Services

14.2%
17.9%

Healthcare

13.6%
13.0%

Communication Services

11.9%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
13.1%

Industrials

9.1%
15.4%

Utilities

7.7%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
3.6%

Energy

4.2%
7.1%

Basic Materials

1.0%
5.6%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.6%

Technology

MINV.L
21.3%
IMV.L
2.8%

Financial Services

MINV.L
14.2%
IMV.L
17.9%

Healthcare

MINV.L
13.6%
IMV.L
13.0%

Communication Services

MINV.L
11.9%
IMV.L
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

MINV.L
10.8%
IMV.L
13.1%

Industrials

MINV.L
9.1%
IMV.L
15.4%

Utilities

MINV.L
7.7%
IMV.L
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MINV.L
5.4%
IMV.L
3.6%

Energy

MINV.L
4.2%
IMV.L
7.1%

Basic Materials

MINV.L
1.0%
IMV.L
5.6%

Real Estate

MINV.L
0.7%
IMV.L
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINV.L vs. IMV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINV.L
MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IMV.L
IMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MINV.LIMV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.17

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

0.97

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

2.92

-1.83

MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the IMV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINV.L and IMV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MINV.LIMV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.91

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.69

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.62

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.71

+0.12

Drawdowns

MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINV.L drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum IMV.L drawdown of -24.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV.L and IMV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINV.LIMV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-24.48%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.31%

-8.50%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

-8.50%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.23%

-17.42%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.38%

-24.48%

+4.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-4.62%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-3.57%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.83%

-0.50%

Volatility

MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) is 2.55%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that MINV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINV.LIMV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

2.89%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.92%

7.71%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.92%

9.13%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.70%

10.97%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.85%

12.31%

-0.46%

MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IMV.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MINV.L vs. IMV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MINV.L nor IMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MINV.L and IMV.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IMV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.

MINV.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IMV.L is Europe Equities. MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MINV.L and 0.25% for IMV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINV.L and IMV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer