MINV.L vs. IITU.L
MINV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - MINV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MINV.L returned 7.86%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MINV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
MINV.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINV.L achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MINV.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 7.86%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
MINV.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- 6.54%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
MINV.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 1.01% | 3.37% | 12.86% | 1.50% | 1.23% | 15.98% | -1.05% | 18.84% | 3.17% | 7.00% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINV.L and IITU.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.56 |
The correlation between MINV.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MINV.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MINV.L
IITU.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
MINV.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
MINV.L
IITU.L
-
Healthcare
MINV.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
MINV.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
MINV.L
IITU.L
-
Industrials
MINV.L
IITU.L
Utilities
MINV.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
MINV.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
MINV.L
IITU.L
Basic Materials
MINV.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
MINV.L
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINV.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
MINV.L
IITU.L
MINV.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MINV.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.44 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 3.17 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | 8.17 | -7.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MINV.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 2.71 | -2.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 1.16 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 1.28 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.23 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
MINV.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINV.L drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINV.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -28.03% | +7.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.31% | -16.76% | +10.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.47% | -28.03% | +19.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.23% | -28.03% | +17.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.38% | -28.03% | +7.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.60% | -2.89% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -5.14% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 6.51% | -4.18% |
Volatility
MINV.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) is 2.55%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that MINV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINV.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 7.01% | -4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.92% | 14.45% | -8.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.92% | 19.60% | -11.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.70% | 21.94% | -12.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 21.31% | -9.46% |
MINV.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MINV.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MINV.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MINV.L and IITU.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.
MINV.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MINV.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for MINV.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer