PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINV.L vs. IBTS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINV.L vs. IBTS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MINV.L is traded in GBp, while IBTS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINV.L achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than IBTS.L's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MINV.L has outperformed IBTS.L with an annualized return of 7.80%, while IBTS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.25% annualized return.


MINV.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
2.74%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.65%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
7.80%

IBTS.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.97%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.39%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
2.11%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
2.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINV.L vs. IBTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
1.59%3.37%12.86%1.50%1.23%15.98%-1.05%18.84%3.17%7.00%
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
0.78%-1.91%5.79%-1.41%7.61%0.64%-0.34%0.37%7.22%-8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MINV.L and IBTS.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.42

The correlation between MINV.L and IBTS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (5 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINV.L vs. IBTS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINV.L
MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTS.L
IBTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINV.L vs. IBTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MINV.LIBTS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.13

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.03

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.55

2.62

-1.06

MINV.L vs. IBTS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINV.L and IBTS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MINV.L vs. IBTS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINV.L drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, smaller than the maximum IBTS.L drawdown of -45.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV.L and IBTS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINV.LIBTS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-45.91%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.31%

-4.51%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-8.89%

-11.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.10%

-16.29%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.38%

-19.02%

-1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

-7.40%

+4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-11.02%

+2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

1.79%

+0.59%

Volatility

MINV.L vs. IBTS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) at 1.63%. This indicates that MINV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINV.LIBTS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

1.63%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.91%

4.42%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.92%

6.11%

+1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

8.09%

+8.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

9.24%

+6.15%

MINV.L vs. IBTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTS.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

MINV.L vs. IBTS.L - Dividend Comparison

MINV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
3.99%4.22%4.12%3.08%0.75%0.61%1.84%2.39%1.49%1.01%0.67%0.49%
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MINV.L and IBTS.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.

MINV.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IBTS.L is Government Bonds. MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IBTS.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MINV.L and 0.07% for IBTS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINV.L and IBTS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer