PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINT.L vs. STYC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINT.L vs. STYC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINT.L achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly higher than STYC.L's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MINT.L has underperformed STYC.L with an annualized return of 2.65%, while STYC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 5.26% annualized return.


MINT.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.39%
6M
2.17%
YTD
2.39%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
2.65%

STYC.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.33%
YTD
1.69%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
5.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINT.L vs. STYC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF
2.39%4.66%5.75%5.72%-0.67%-0.09%1.30%3.28%1.65%1.86%
STYC.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc
1.69%9.13%8.08%11.66%-4.84%4.37%3.84%10.02%-0.49%5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MINT.L and STYC.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015

0.05

The correlation between MINT.L and STYC.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINT.L vs. STYC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINT.L
MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

STYC.L
STYC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
STYC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STYC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
STYC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
STYC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
STYC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINT.L vs. STYC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MINT.LSTYC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+14.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.57

1.35

+2.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

45.35

3.67

+41.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

232.26

14.40

+217.87

MINT.L vs. STYC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINT.L Sharpe Ratio is 7.86, which is higher than the STYC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINT.L and STYC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MINT.L vs. STYC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINT.L drawdown since its inception was -3.89%, smaller than the maximum STYC.L drawdown of -21.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT.L and STYC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINT.LSTYC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-21.57%

+17.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-1.68%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.62%

-5.94%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.47%

-9.62%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.89%

-21.57%

+17.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-1.65%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.43%

-0.41%

Volatility

MINT.L vs. STYC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) is 0.14%, while PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) has a volatility of 0.51%. This indicates that MINT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STYC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINT.LSTYC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

0.51%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.35%

2.70%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58%

3.39%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.76%

5.71%

-4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.95%

6.43%

-5.48%

Dividends

MINT.L vs. STYC.L - Dividend Comparison

MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while STYC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF
4.36%4.43%5.18%4.81%1.51%0.34%1.17%2.63%2.33%1.56%1.31%0.79%
STYC.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MINT.L and STYC.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MINT.L is categorized as Global Equities, while STYC.L is High Yield Bonds. MINT.L tracks PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF, while STYC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINT.L and STYC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer