PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINT.L vs. KSTR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINT.L vs. KSTR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) and KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINT.L achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR.L's 41.53% return.


MINT.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.39%
6M
2.17%
YTD
2.39%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
2.65%

KSTR.L

1D
-4.62%
1M
3.52%
6M
25.64%
YTD
41.53%
1Y
93.56%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
-0.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINT.L vs. KSTR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF
2.39%4.66%5.75%5.72%-0.67%-0.22%
KSTR.L
KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF
41.53%42.76%5.23%-18.80%-38.16%2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MINT.L and KSTR.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.01

The correlation between MINT.L and KSTR.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINT.L vs. KSTR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINT.L
MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

KSTR.L
KSTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
KSTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINT.L vs. KSTR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) and KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MINT.LKSTR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+14.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.57

1.38

+2.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

45.35

4.76

+40.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

232.26

12.21

+220.06

MINT.L vs. KSTR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINT.L Sharpe Ratio is 7.86, which is higher than the KSTR.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINT.L and KSTR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MINT.L vs. KSTR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINT.L drawdown since its inception was -3.89%, smaller than the maximum KSTR.L drawdown of -66.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT.L and KSTR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINT.LKSTR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-66.67%

+62.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-19.42%

+19.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.62%

-36.60%

+35.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.47%

-66.38%

+63.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.75%

+18.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-39.83%

+39.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

7.58%

-7.56%

Volatility

MINT.L vs. KSTR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) is 0.14%, while KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L) has a volatility of 19.20%. This indicates that MINT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSTR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINT.LKSTR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

19.20%

-19.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.35%

33.48%

-33.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58%

40.57%

-39.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.76%

34.52%

-33.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.95%

34.46%

-33.51%

Dividends

MINT.L vs. KSTR.L - Dividend Comparison

MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while KSTR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KSTR.L
KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF
4.36%4.43%5.18%4.81%1.51%0.34%1.17%2.63%2.33%1.56%1.31%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


MINT.L and KSTR.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MINT.L tracks PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF, while KSTR.L tracks KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and KraneShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINT.L and KSTR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer