MINT.L vs. EMLP.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

MINT.L (PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF) and EMLP.L (PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - MINT.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF, while EMLP.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MINT.L returned 2.65%/yr vs 3.12%/yr for EMLP.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MINT.L vs. EMLP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MINT.L is traded in USD, while EMLP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EMLP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINT.L achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than EMLP.L's 2.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MINT.L has underperformed EMLP.L with an annualized return of 2.65%, while EMLP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 3.12% annualized return.

MINT.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.39%
• 6M: 2.17%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 1Y: 4.58%
• 3Y*: 5.23%
• 5Y*: 3.49%
• 10Y*: 2.65%

EMLP.L

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.17%
• 6M: 1.99%
• YTD: 2.53%
• 1Y: 8.40%
• 3Y*: 5.74%
• 5Y*: 4.04%
• 10Y*: 3.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINT.L vs. EMLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MINT.L PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF	2.39%	4.66%	5.75%	5.72%	-0.67%	-0.09%	1.30%	3.28%	1.65%	1.86%
EMLP.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc	2.53%	17.33%	-3.31%	13.19%	-5.73%	-5.19%	1.46%	13.96%	-7.04%	12.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MINT.L and EMLP.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011	0.04

The correlation between MINT.L and EMLP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MINT.L vs. EMLP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINT.L

MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

EMLP.L

EMLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 52
EMLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EMLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
EMLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 54
EMLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
EMLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINT.L vs. EMLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MINT.L	EMLP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.86	1.25	+6.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	16.90	1.88	+15.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.57	1.23	+2.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	45.35	1.40	+43.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	232.26	4.45	+227.81

MINT.L vs. EMLP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINT.L Sharpe Ratio is 7.86, which is higher than the EMLP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINT.L and EMLP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MINT.L vs. EMLP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINT.L drawdown since its inception was -3.89%, smaller than the maximum EMLP.L drawdown of -54.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT.L and EMLP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MINT.L	EMLP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-54.49%	+50.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.10%	-5.82%	+5.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.62%	-7.37%	+6.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.47%	-19.19%	+16.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-3.89%	-20.62%	+16.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-25.94%	+25.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-36.30%	+36.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	1.83%	-1.81%

Volatility

MINT.L vs. EMLP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) is 0.14%, while PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that MINT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MINT.L	EMLP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.14%	1.30%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.35%	5.41%	-5.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58%	6.49%	-5.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.76%	9.03%	-8.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.95%	9.16%	-8.21%

Dividends

MINT.L vs. EMLP.L - Dividend Comparison

MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while EMLP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMLP.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINT.L PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF	4.36%	4.43%	5.18%	4.81%	1.51%	0.34%	1.17%	2.63%	2.33%	1.56%	1.31%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MINT.L and EMLP.L in my portfolio?

MINT.L and EMLP.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between MINT.L and EMLP.L?

MINT.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EMLP.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. MINT.L tracks PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF, while EMLP.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD.