MINIX vs. MEIKX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX).
MINIX is managed by MFS. MEIKX is managed by MFS. It was launched on May 1, 2006.
Performance
MINIX vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MINIX vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINIX MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I | -3.26% | 33.06% | 7.35% | 18.04% | -23.05% | 10.55% | 20.45% | 25.90% | -9.02% | 27.14% |
MEIKX MFS Value Fund | -0.52% | 13.37% | 11.98% | 8.32% | -5.92% | 25.59% | 4.09% | 30.18% | -9.81% | 17.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINIX achieves a -3.26% return, which is significantly lower than MEIKX's -0.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MINIX having a 9.57% annualized return and MEIKX not far ahead at 9.92%.
MINIX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -11.89%
- YTD
- -3.26%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 18.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
MEIKX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 8.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MINIX vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINIX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MINIX vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank
MINIX
MEIKX
MINIX vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MINIX | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 0.66 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 0.99 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 0.79 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 3.49 | +1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MINIX | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 0.66 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.60 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.60 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.39 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between MINIX and MEIKX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MINIX vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison
MINIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, less than MEIKX's 9.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINIX MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I | 8.03% | 7.77% | 12.02% | 11.21% | 13.90% | 7.25% | 5.25% | 3.94% | 4.49% | 2.62% | 1.82% | 3.20% |
MEIKX MFS Value Fund | 9.98% | 9.72% | 9.49% | 8.58% | 7.77% | 3.43% | 2.75% | 3.28% | 3.76% | 4.14% | 3.84% | 6.12% |
Drawdowns
MINIX vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINIX drawdown since its inception was -51.72%, smaller than the maximum MEIKX drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINIX and MEIKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINIX | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.72% | -56.81% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -11.09% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.78% | -17.50% | -19.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -36.68% | -0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.89% | -6.54% | -5.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -9.51% | +0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.50% | +0.63% |
Volatility
MINIX vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) at 3.12%. This indicates that MINIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MINIX | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 3.12% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 7.68% | +2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 14.77% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 13.90% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 16.55% | -1.03% |