PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIGNX vs. MITTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIGNX vs. MITTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund Class R6 (MIGNX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIGNX achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than MITTX's 8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MIGNX has outperformed MITTX with an annualized return of 14.98%, while MITTX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.61% annualized return.


MIGNX

1D
-0.61%
1M
3.16%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
0.32%
1Y
10.06%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
14.98%

MITTX

1D
0.08%
1M
3.36%
YTD
8.10%
6M
8.84%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIGNX vs. MITTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIGNX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund Class R6
-0.18%10.31%27.60%24.51%-18.92%26.52%22.96%40.34%1.14%29.12%
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
8.10%13.67%19.69%19.26%-16.27%26.73%18.72%31.92%-5.56%23.55%

Correlation

The correlation between MIGNX and MITTX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2012

0.96

The correlation between MIGNX and MITTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIGNX vs. MITTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIGNX
MIGNX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MIGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MIGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

MITTX
MITTX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MITTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MITTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIGNX vs. MITTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund Class R6 (MIGNX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIGNXMITTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.34

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

2.17

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.67

9.43

-6.75

MIGNX vs. MITTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIGNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the MITTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIGNX and MITTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIGNXMITTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.89

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.66

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.79

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.43

+0.45

Drawdowns

MIGNX vs. MITTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIGNX drawdown since its inception was -32.40%, smaller than the maximum MITTX drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGNX and MITTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIGNXMITTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.40%

-49.54%

+17.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-9.76%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-16.10%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.48%

-23.27%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.40%

-33.45%

+1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

0.00%

-2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-10.54%

+6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

2.24%

+1.82%

Volatility

MIGNX vs. MITTX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund Class R6 (MIGNX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX) at 2.44%. This indicates that MIGNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MITTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIGNXMITTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

2.44%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.79%

8.56%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

11.21%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

15.68%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

17.21%

+1.00%

MIGNX vs. MITTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIGNX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than MITTX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIGNX vs. MITTX - Dividend Comparison

MIGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.17%, less than MITTX's 13.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIGNX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund Class R6
11.17%11.15%16.98%4.25%4.67%10.36%7.48%7.46%10.83%7.02%4.99%6.73%
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
13.25%14.33%14.47%10.96%9.35%8.66%8.14%7.58%13.49%7.27%5.55%6.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MIGNX and MITTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MIGNX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to MITTX (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIGNX dropped -32.40% vs MITTX's -49.54%.

MITTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIGNX and MITTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer