PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MID vs. ACSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MID vs. ACSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) and American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MID achieves a 2.51% return, which is significantly lower than ACSG's 16.78% return.


MID

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.00%
6M
1.56%
YTD
2.51%
1Y
1.83%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.07%

ACSG

1D
-0.66%
1M
-3.40%
6M
14.08%
YTD
16.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$149.77K$163.97K$222.53K
$78.49K$249.03K$206.22K

MID vs. ACSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MID and ACSG is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025

0.84

MID vs. ACSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MID
ACSG

Technology

33.9%
23.4%

Industrials

20.5%
18.4%

Healthcare

12.8%
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
7.2%

Energy

7.6%
4.4%

Communication Services

4.5%
1.9%

Utilities

3.2%
1.3%

Financial Services

2.7%
7.8%

Basic Materials

2.4%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Technology

MID
33.9%
ACSG
23.4%

Industrials

MID
20.5%
ACSG
18.4%

Healthcare

MID
12.8%
ACSG
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MID
12.5%
ACSG
7.2%

Energy

MID
7.6%
ACSG
4.4%

Communication Services

MID
4.5%
ACSG
1.9%

Utilities

MID
3.2%
ACSG
1.3%

Financial Services

MID
2.7%
ACSG
7.8%

Basic Materials

MID
2.4%
ACSG
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

MID
1.6%
ACSG
2.0%

Real Estate

MID

-

ACSG
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MID vs. ACSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MID
MID Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MID Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MID Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MID Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MID Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ACSG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MID vs. ACSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) and American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIDACSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.26

MID vs. ACSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MID vs. ACSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MID drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, which is greater than ACSG's maximum drawdown of -13.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MID and ACSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDACSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.15%

-13.28%

-26.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.83%

-5.00%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.15%

-2.87%

-10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

Volatility

MID vs. ACSG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDACSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.75%

22.34%

-4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.72%

22.34%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.80%

22.34%

+1.46%

MID vs. ACSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MID has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ACSG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

MID vs. ACSG - Dividend Comparison

MID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while ACSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
ACSG
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MID
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF
0.15%0.18%0.17%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MID and ACSG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MID is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MID is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSG.

MID has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for ACSG.

MID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while ACSG is Small Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MID and 0.49% for ACSG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MID and ACSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer