MIBX.L vs. LDEU.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

MIBX.L (Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist) and LDEU.L (L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis) are both Europe Equities funds - MIBX.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR while LDEU.L tracks the L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIBX.L returned 21.70%/yr vs 16.82%/yr for LDEU.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIBX.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LDEU.L.

Performance

MIBX.L vs. LDEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) and L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis (LDEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MIBX.L is traded in GBp, while LDEU.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LDEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIBX.L achieves a 18.63% return, which is significantly higher than LDEU.L's 11.99% return.

MIBX.L

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: 17.18%
• YTD: 18.63%
• 1Y: 35.91%
• 3Y*: 28.13%
• 5Y*: 21.70%
• 10Y*: 16.42%

LDEU.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.65%
• 6M: 9.70%
• YTD: 11.99%
• 1Y: 26.76%
• 3Y*: 24.77%
• 5Y*: 16.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIBX.L vs. LDEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist	18.63%	43.78%	13.17%	30.61%	-3.53%	10.99%
LDEU.L L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis	11.99%	44.92%	9.43%	14.43%	1.84%	5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MIBX.L and LDEU.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021	0.86

The correlation between MIBX.L and LDEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MIBX.L vs. LDEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIBX.L

MIBX.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
MIBX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MIBX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
MIBX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
MIBX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MIBX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

LDEU.L

LDEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
LDEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LDEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
LDEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
LDEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIBX.L vs. LDEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) and L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis (LDEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIBX.L	LDEU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.28	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	3.08	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.41	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	3.40	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.08	12.02	+0.06

MIBX.L vs. LDEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIBX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIBX.L and LDEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIBX.L vs. LDEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIBX.L drawdown since its inception was -67.93%, which is greater than LDEU.L's maximum drawdown of -17.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIBX.L and LDEU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIBX.L	LDEU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.93%	-17.44%	-50.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.26%	-7.91%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.64%	-13.34%	-2.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.06%	-17.44%	-6.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-1.58%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.74%	-2.98%	-36.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	2.24%	+0.64%

Volatility

MIBX.L vs. LDEU.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis (LDEU.L) at 2.99%. This indicates that MIBX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIBX.L	LDEU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	2.99%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.60%	9.61%	+2.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.16%	11.77%	+3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.93%	14.58%	+3.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	14.43%	+4.40%

MIBX.L vs. LDEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIBX.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LDEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIBX.L vs. LDEU.L - Dividend Comparison

MIBX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than LDEU.L's 3.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LDEU.L L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis	3.52%	3.47%	4.36%	4.44%	4.17%	2.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist	3.11%	3.68%	3.93%	3.73%	3.88%	2.09%	1.55%	4.02%	4.05%	2.75%	3.56%	3.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIBX.L and LDEU.L in my portfolio?

MIBX.L and LDEU.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MIBX.L or LDEU.L?

On fees, LDEU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MIBX.L or LDEU.L?

LDEU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MIBX.L.

What is the main difference between MIBX.L and LDEU.L?

MIBX.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR, while LDEU.L tracks L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MIBX.L and 0.25% for LDEU.L.