MIBX.L vs. EEIP.L
MIBX.L (Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist) and EEIP.L (WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc) are both Europe Equities funds - MIBX.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR while EEIP.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIBX.L returned 19.80%/yr vs 12.51%/yr for EEIP.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MIBX.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for EEIP.L.
Performance
MIBX.L vs. EEIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIBX.L achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly higher than EEIP.L's 12.56% return.
MIBX.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 13.44%
- 6M
- 16.90%
- 1Y
- 32.99%
- 3Y*
- 28.91%
- 5Y*
- 19.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.09%
EEIP.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 12.56%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 29.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- —
MIBX.L vs. EEIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 13.44% | 43.78% | 13.17% | 30.61% | -3.53% | 18.16% | 1.49% | 25.15% | -12.72% | 21.14% |
EEIP.L WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc | 12.56% | 34.46% | -1.80% | 12.45% | 6.20% | 11.06% | -13.70% | 14.22% | -6.64% | 13.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIBX.L and EEIP.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between MIBX.L and EEIP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MIBX.L vs. EEIP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Financial Services
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
Utilities
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
Industrials
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
Consumer Cyclical
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
Energy
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
Technology
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
Healthcare
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
Communication Services
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
Basic Materials
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
Consumer Defensive
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
Real Estate
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIBX.L vs. EEIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
MIBX.L
EEIP.L
MIBX.L vs. EEIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) and WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (EEIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIBX.L | EEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.49 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 3.72 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 14.68 | -2.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIBX.L | EEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.67 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.95 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.56 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
MIBX.L vs. EEIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIBX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, roughly equal to the maximum EEIP.L drawdown of -34.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIBX.L and EEIP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIBX.L | EEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -34.51% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.26% | -7.92% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -11.00% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.05% | -14.49% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -1.22% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -5.49% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.01% | +0.83% |
Volatility
MIBX.L vs. EEIP.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (EEIP.L) at 3.16%. This indicates that MIBX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIBX.L | EEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 3.16% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 8.81% | +3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.08% | 11.04% | +4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 13.20% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 15.14% | +4.02% |
MIBX.L vs. EEIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIBX.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EEIP.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIBX.L vs. EEIP.L - Dividend Comparison
MIBX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, while EEIP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEIP.L WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 3.25% | 3.68% | 3.93% | 3.72% | 3.89% | 2.08% | 1.55% | 4.02% | 4.05% | 2.75% | 3.56% | 3.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIBX.L and EEIP.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EEIP.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEIP.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MIBX.L.
MIBX.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR, while EEIP.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MIBX.L and 0.29% for EEIP.L.
Find the right allocation for MIBX.L and EEIP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer