PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIAIX vs. MFEKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIAIX vs. MFEKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund (MIAIX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIAIX achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than MFEKX's 6.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MIAIX has underperformed MFEKX with an annualized return of 2.07%, while MFEKX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.77% annualized return.


MIAIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.33%
6M
0.78%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
3.21%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
2.07%

MFEKX

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.76%
YTD
6.33%
6M
6.01%
1Y
17.76%
3Y*
26.68%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
17.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIAIX vs. MFEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIAIX
MFS Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund
1.33%5.89%1.66%2.15%-11.87%4.64%10.56%8.03%-1.83%2.56%
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
6.33%12.44%49.62%36.27%-31.07%23.71%31.77%37.82%2.40%30.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MIAIX and MFEKX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2011

-0.05

The correlation between MIAIX and MFEKX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIAIX vs. MFEKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIAIX
MIAIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MIAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MIAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MFEKX
MFEKX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MFEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIAIX vs. MFEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund (MIAIX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIAIXMFEKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

1.06

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

3.46

+2.70

MIAIX vs. MFEKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the MFEKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIAIX and MFEKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIAIXMFEKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.16

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.66

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.84

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.87

-0.39

Drawdowns

MIAIX vs. MFEKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIAIX drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum MFEKX drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIAIX and MFEKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIAIXMFEKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-36.06%

+20.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-17.27%

+15.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.64%

-23.22%

+17.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

-36.06%

+20.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.99%

-36.06%

+20.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

-0.34%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.25%

-5.64%

+1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

5.30%

-4.57%

Volatility

MIAIX vs. MFEKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund (MIAIX) is 0.94%, while MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that MIAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIAIXMFEKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

3.59%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.41%

12.24%

-9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

15.83%

-12.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.18%

21.89%

-15.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.48%

21.20%

-15.72%

MIAIX vs. MFEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIAIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MFEKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIAIX vs. MFEKX - Dividend Comparison

MIAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than MFEKX's 13.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
13.94%14.82%25.31%4.82%1.04%2.74%3.55%1.57%3.88%2.49%1.70%3.64%
MIAIX
MFS Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund
4.05%4.10%4.10%4.00%7.96%5.10%1.45%2.18%2.85%2.14%1.82%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIAIX and MFEKX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEKX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to MIAIX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIAIX dropped -15.99% vs MFEKX's -36.06%.

MIAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIAIX and MFEKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer