MHIP vs. IHE
MHIP (Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF) and IHE (iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. MHIP is actively managed, while IHE is passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MHIP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IHE.
Performance
MHIP vs. IHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MHIP
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IHE
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 23.00%
- YTD
- 22.68%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 23.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
MHIP vs. IHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MHIP Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF | 1.64% |
IHE iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF | 17.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between MHIP and IHE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MHIP vs. IHE — Risk / Return Rank
MHIP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IHE
MHIP vs. IHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP) and iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MHIP | IHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.55 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 21.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MHIP vs. IHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MHIP drawdown since its inception was -3.09%, smaller than the maximum IHE drawdown of -38.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHIP and IHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MHIP | IHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -38.20% | +35.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -7.88% | +6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.75% | — |
Volatility
MHIP vs. IHE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MHIP | IHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.86% | 18.01% | -6.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.86% | 16.46% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.86% | 18.05% | -6.19% |
MHIP vs. IHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MHIP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IHE's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
MHIP vs. IHE - Dividend Comparison
MHIP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHE iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.42% | 1.76% | 1.73% | 1.39% | 2.01% | 1.49% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 1.25% | 1.36% | 0.92% | 1.93% |
MHIP Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MHIP and IHE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IHE is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IHE is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MHIP.
IHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for MHIP.
They also come from different issuers: Milliman and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MHIP and 0.42% for IHE.
Find the right allocation for MHIP and IHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer