PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHH vs. NVDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MHH vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mastech Digital, Inc. (MHH) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHH achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than NVDL's 4.65% return.


MHH

1D
-3.89%
1M
-6.08%
6M
6.77%
YTD
6.16%
1Y
-0.94%
3Y*
-10.86%
5Y*
-14.16%
10Y*
7.96%

NVDL

1D
-7.05%
1M
-3.55%
6M
6.87%
YTD
4.65%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
87.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHH vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MHH
Mastech Digital, Inc.
6.16%-53.15%76.79%-23.45%-5.33%
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
4.65%32.57%344.58%432.18%-28.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MHH and NVDL is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHH vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHH
MHH Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHH Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHH Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDL
NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHH vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastech Digital, Inc. (MHH) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MHHNVDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.11

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

0.49

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

1.01

-1.07

MHH vs. NVDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHH Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the NVDL Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHH and NVDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MHH vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHH drawdown since its inception was -89.23%, which is greater than NVDL's maximum drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHH and NVDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHHNVDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.23%

-67.55%

-21.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.76%

-42.23%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.58%

-67.55%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.15%

-28.63%

-45.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.02%

-17.27%

-31.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.40%

20.50%

-5.10%

Volatility

MHH vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison

Mastech Digital, Inc. (MHH) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) have volatilities of 22.39% and 21.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHHNVDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.39%

21.48%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.86%

54.54%

-10.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.65%

71.21%

-12.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.20%

90.15%

-34.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.35%

90.15%

-30.80%

Dividends

MHH vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MHH nor NVDL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
MHH
Mastech Digital, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHH and NVDL have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHH has higher volatility (22.39%) compared to NVDL (21.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHH dropped -89.23% vs NVDL's -67.55%.

NVDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHH and NVDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer