PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHESX vs. LFMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MHESX vs. LFMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund (MHESX) and LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I (LFMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MHESX having a 9.63% return and LFMIX slightly higher at 10.03%. Over the past 10 years, MHESX has outperformed LFMIX with an annualized return of 5.41%, while LFMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.15% annualized return.


MHESX

1D
0.28%
1M
3.76%
YTD
9.63%
6M
11.51%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
11.44%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
5.41%

LFMIX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
10.03%
6M
10.52%
1Y
15.13%
3Y*
5.43%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
4.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHESX vs. LFMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MHESX
MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund
9.63%17.63%0.77%12.54%-26.14%6.62%20.24%20.22%-17.04%21.72%
LFMIX
LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I
10.03%2.89%6.77%-6.55%15.43%0.07%4.55%12.71%-5.11%2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between MHESX and LFMIX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2011

0.12

Over the past year, MHESX and LFMIX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHESX vs. LFMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHESX
MHESX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MHESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHESX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MHESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHESX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

LFMIX
LFMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
LFMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
LFMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHESX vs. LFMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund (MHESX) and LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I (LFMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MHESXLFMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.51

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

5.85

-3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.68

18.72

-8.03

MHESX vs. LFMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHESX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the LFMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHESX and LFMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MHESXLFMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.72

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.60

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.55

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.37

-0.15

Drawdowns

MHESX vs. LFMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHESX drawdown since its inception was -46.01%, which is greater than LFMIX's maximum drawdown of -22.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHESX and LFMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHESXLFMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.01%

-22.68%

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-2.60%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

-8.88%

-10.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.05%

-12.26%

-23.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

-12.26%

-23.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-6.77%

-4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

0.81%

+1.45%

Volatility

MHESX vs. LFMIX - Volatility Comparison

MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund (MHESX) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I (LFMIX) at 1.26%. This indicates that MHESX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHESXLFMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

1.26%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

4.29%

+4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

5.58%

+5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

7.20%

+7.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

7.61%

+7.22%

MHESX vs. LFMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MHESX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than LFMIX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

MHESX vs. LFMIX - Dividend Comparison

MHESX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LFMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFMIX
LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I
2.85%3.14%3.21%3.17%14.35%4.95%4.73%4.66%3.12%5.89%1.95%3.08%
MHESX
MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund
0.00%0.00%0.94%0.20%6.43%4.56%4.72%1.74%0.75%2.41%3.16%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHESX and LFMIX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHESX has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to LFMIX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHESX dropped -46.01% vs LFMIX's -22.68%.

LFMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHESX and LFMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer