MHESX vs. CGO
MHESX (MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund) and CGO (Calamos Global Total Return Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, MHESX returned 5.25%/yr vs 10.86%/yr for CGO. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MHESX charges 0.21%/yr vs 2.86%/yr for CGO.
Performance
MHESX vs. CGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MHESX achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly lower than CGO's 17.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MHESX has underperformed CGO with an annualized return of 5.25%, while CGO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.
MHESX
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 21.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 5.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.22%
CGO
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 21.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $399.93K | $405.56K | $413.51K | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MHESX vs. CGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MHESX MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund | 9.63% | 17.63% | 0.77% | 12.54% | -26.14% | 6.62% | 20.24% | 20.22% | -17.04% | 21.72% |
CGO Calamos Global Total Return Fund | 17.25% | 8.87% | 36.81% | 14.03% | -36.60% | 13.04% | 20.87% | 45.08% | -26.14% | 56.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MHESX and CGO is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2006 | 0.53 |
The correlation between MHESX and CGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MHESX vs. CGO — Risk / Return Rank
MHESX
CGO
MHESX vs. CGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund (MHESX) and Calamos Global Total Return Fund (CGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MHESX | CGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.21 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 1.39 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.37 | 4.30 | +5.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MHESX vs. CGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MHESX drawdown since its inception was -46.01%, smaller than the maximum CGO drawdown of -60.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHESX and CGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MHESX | CGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.01% | -60.03% | +14.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -15.24% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.47% | -26.70% | +7.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.05% | -43.69% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.05% | -50.89% | +14.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -7.76% | +7.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.59% | -11.51% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 4.93% | -2.62% |
Volatility
MHESX vs. CGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund (MHESX) is 2.91%, while Calamos Global Total Return Fund (CGO) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that MHESX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MHESX | CGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 6.85% | -3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.33% | 15.48% | -6.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.41% | 18.11% | -6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 20.66% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 24.81% | -10.06% |
MHESX vs. CGO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MHESX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CGO's 2.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
MHESX vs. CGO - Dividend Comparison
MHESX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGO Calamos Global Total Return Fund | 7.55% | 8.43% | 8.43% | 10.57% | 12.68% | 7.80% | 8.18% | 8.96% | 11.81% | 7.97% | 11.40% | 10.51% |
MHESX MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.20% | 6.43% | 4.56% | 4.72% | 1.74% | 0.75% | 2.41% | 3.16% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MHESX and CGO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGO has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to MHESX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHESX dropped -46.01% vs CGO's -60.03%.
MHESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MHESX and CGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer