MHEIX vs. PFADX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MHEIX (MH Elite Income Fund of Funds) and PFADX (PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, MHEIX returned 2.20%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for PFADX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MHEIX charges 1.25%/yr vs 2.05%/yr for PFADX.

Performance

MHEIX vs. PFADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MH Elite Income Fund of Funds (MHEIX) and PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHEIX achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than PFADX's 3.38% return.

MHEIX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 2.09%
• 6M: 2.65%
• 1Y: 8.60%
• 3Y*: 6.23%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: 3.18%

PFADX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 6M: 3.38%
• 1Y: 9.29%
• 3Y*: 5.36%
• 5Y*: 1.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHEIX vs. PFADX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MHEIX MH Elite Income Fund of Funds	2.09%	4.76%	5.98%	7.55%	-9.83%	2.44%	5.27%	11.10%	-3.24%	0.19%
PFADX PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund	3.38%	7.07%	2.13%	3.69%	-9.50%	3.85%	7.25%	8.16%	-5.20%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MHEIX and PFADX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between MHEIX and PFADX has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MHEIX vs. PFADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHEIX

MHEIX Risk / Return Rank: 31
MHEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
MHEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MHEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
MHEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
MHEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

PFADX

PFADX Risk / Return Rank: 52
PFADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
PFADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
PFADX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
PFADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
PFADX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHEIX vs. PFADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MH Elite Income Fund of Funds (MHEIX) and PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MHEIX	PFADX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.21	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	3.17	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.42	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	2.60	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.99	9.10	-4.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MHEIX vs. PFADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the PFADX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHEIX and PFADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MHEIX	PFADX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	2.21	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.24	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.42	+0.18

Drawdowns

MHEIX vs. PFADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHEIX drawdown since its inception was -16.95%, roughly equal to the maximum PFADX drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHEIX and PFADX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MHEIX	PFADX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.95%	-16.64%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.54%	-3.63%	-0.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.57%	-6.38%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.62%	-16.64%	+3.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-0.98%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-5.30%	+2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	1.04%	+0.69%

Volatility

MHEIX vs. PFADX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MH Elite Income Fund of Funds (MHEIX) is 1.09%, while PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) has a volatility of 1.53%. This indicates that MHEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MHEIX	PFADX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	1.53%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.86%	3.40%	+2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.19%	4.27%	+1.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.56%	5.86%	-0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.23%	5.54%	-0.31%

MHEIX vs. PFADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MHEIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PFADX's 2.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

MHEIX vs. PFADX - Dividend Comparison

MHEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than PFADX's 2.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MHEIX MH Elite Income Fund of Funds	3.71%	0.00%	3.33%	2.38%	3.17%	1.49%	2.30%	2.21%	2.10%	1.69%	2.48%	2.87%
PFADX PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund	2.38%	2.46%	2.89%	1.04%	5.33%	3.46%	0.08%	1.51%	0.91%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MHEIX and PFADX in my portfolio?

MHEIX and PFADX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MHEIX or PFADX?

PFADX has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to MHEIX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHEIX dropped -16.95% vs PFADX's -16.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.