PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHD vs. AFB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MHD vs. AFB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund (MHD) and AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHD achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly lower than AFB's 6.20% return. Over the past 10 years, MHD has underperformed AFB with an annualized return of 0.54%, while AFB has yielded a comparatively higher 1.60% annualized return.


MHD

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.12%
YTD
1.85%
6M
2.90%
1Y
10.70%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
-2.00%
10Y*
0.54%

AFB

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.72%
YTD
6.20%
6M
5.81%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
-1.26%
10Y*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHD vs. AFB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MHD
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund
1.85%7.04%3.38%2.06%-23.70%8.09%0.24%20.68%-5.47%8.08%
AFB
AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund
6.20%4.41%4.10%7.41%-25.93%7.25%7.80%20.13%-5.43%6.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MHD and AFB is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2002

0.43

The correlation between MHD and AFB shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHD vs. AFB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHD
MHD Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

AFB
AFB Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFB Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHD vs. AFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund (MHD) and AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MHDAFBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

2.64

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

9.98

-3.02

MHD vs. AFB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the AFB Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHD and AFB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MHDAFBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.01

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

-0.12

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.14

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.33

0.00

Drawdowns

MHD vs. AFB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHD drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum AFB drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHD and AFB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHDAFBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.95%

-50.98%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-5.96%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-16.32%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.68%

-35.17%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.68%

-35.17%

-1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.99%

-9.57%

-4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-8.98%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.58%

-0.04%

Volatility

MHD vs. AFB - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund (MHD) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB) at 2.64%. This indicates that MHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHDAFBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

2.64%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.76%

5.73%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.58%

7.88%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

10.94%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.03%

11.24%

+2.79%

MHD vs. AFB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MHD has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than AFB's 1.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

MHD vs. AFB - Dividend Comparison

MHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than AFB's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFB
AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund
5.02%4.72%3.83%3.62%5.26%4.32%4.18%3.93%4.53%4.71%5.34%5.80%
MHD
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund
6.12%6.08%5.58%3.82%5.63%4.34%4.49%4.62%6.11%5.86%6.16%6.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHD and AFB have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHD has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to AFB (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHD dropped -45.95% vs AFB's -50.98%.

AFB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHD and AFB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer