PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGSMX vs. KDHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGSMX vs. KDHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund (MGSMX) and DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Fd (KDHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGSMX achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than KDHAX's 11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MGSMX has underperformed KDHAX with an annualized return of 1.57%, while KDHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.22% annualized return.


MGSMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.92%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
1.57%

KDHAX

1D
0.34%
1M
7.96%
YTD
11.60%
6M
11.67%
1Y
19.25%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
9.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGSMX vs. KDHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGSMX
DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund
0.66%4.06%2.86%3.52%-3.40%0.26%2.94%4.13%1.47%0.96%
KDHAX
DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Fd
11.60%2.92%13.37%5.30%1.09%19.44%-9.41%29.38%-3.45%19.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MGSMX and KDHAX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 1995

0.01

The correlation between MGSMX and KDHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGSMX vs. KDHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGSMX
MGSMX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MGSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MGSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

KDHAX
KDHAX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
KDHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KDHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
KDHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
KDHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
KDHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGSMX vs. KDHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund (MGSMX) and DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Fd (KDHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGSMXKDHAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.58

1.52

+1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.57

2.32

+2.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.26

+0.63

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.88

+0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.94

5.12

+2.81

MGSMX vs. KDHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGSMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the KDHAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGSMX and KDHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGSMXKDHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

1.52

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.55

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

0.55

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.47

-0.02

Drawdowns

MGSMX vs. KDHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGSMX drawdown since its inception was -7.81%, smaller than the maximum KDHAX drawdown of -65.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGSMX and KDHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGSMXKDHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-65.77%

+57.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.16%

-10.93%

+9.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.62%

-16.91%

+15.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.87%

-16.91%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.87%

-40.08%

+34.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

0.00%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-9.40%

+7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

3.99%

-3.59%

Volatility

MGSMX vs. KDHAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund (MGSMX) is 0.40%, while DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Fd (KDHAX) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that MGSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KDHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGSMXKDHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

3.67%

-3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.96%

9.35%

-8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25%

13.55%

-12.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.53%

14.01%

-12.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.60%

16.86%

-15.26%

MGSMX vs. KDHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGSMX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than KDHAX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGSMX vs. KDHAX - Dividend Comparison

MGSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than KDHAX's 14.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KDHAX
DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Fd
14.92%15.94%9.07%5.94%6.24%9.57%5.53%7.13%12.23%1.60%1.81%2.34%
MGSMX
DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund
2.74%3.26%2.72%2.01%1.19%1.15%2.00%2.44%2.05%1.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGSMX and KDHAX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KDHAX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to MGSMX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGSMX dropped -7.81% vs KDHAX's -65.77%.

MGSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGSMX and KDHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer