PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGRDX vs. JEMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGRDX vs. JEMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Growth Fund R6 (MGRDX) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JEMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGRDX achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly higher than JEMDX's 2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MGRDX has outperformed JEMDX with an annualized return of 10.06%, while JEMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.29% annualized return.


MGRDX

1D
0.45%
1M
3.75%
YTD
4.17%
6M
5.12%
1Y
11.83%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
10.06%

JEMDX

1D
0.30%
1M
1.10%
YTD
2.45%
6M
3.08%
1Y
14.56%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
3.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGRDX vs. JEMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGRDX
MFS International Growth Fund R6
4.17%21.18%9.22%14.99%-15.00%9.61%15.82%27.32%-8.79%32.56%
JEMDX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund
2.45%13.87%7.37%10.17%-18.60%-3.22%5.37%13.86%-5.82%10.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MGRDX and JEMDX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.45

The correlation between MGRDX and JEMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (10 years) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGRDX vs. JEMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGRDX
MGRDX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MGRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MGRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

JEMDX
JEMDX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JEMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGRDX vs. JEMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Growth Fund R6 (MGRDX) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JEMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGRDXJEMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.70

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.92

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.05

12.29

-9.24

MGRDX vs. JEMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGRDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the JEMDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGRDX and JEMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGRDXJEMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

3.18

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.29

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.46

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.67

-0.38

Drawdowns

MGRDX vs. JEMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGRDX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, which is greater than JEMDX's maximum drawdown of -38.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGRDX and JEMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGRDXJEMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.75%

-38.84%

-21.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-5.14%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-7.10%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-30.83%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.60%

-30.83%

+0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-0.35%

-2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.43%

-6.09%

-6.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

1.22%

+2.44%

Volatility

MGRDX vs. JEMDX - Volatility Comparison

MFS International Growth Fund R6 (MGRDX) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JEMDX) at 1.70%. This indicates that MGRDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGRDXJEMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

1.70%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

3.98%

+6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.26%

4.72%

+8.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

6.92%

+8.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

7.14%

+8.63%

MGRDX vs. JEMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGRDX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than JEMDX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGRDX vs. JEMDX - Dividend Comparison

MGRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than JEMDX's 5.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JEMDX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund
5.87%5.61%6.13%5.47%6.15%4.38%3.71%4.52%4.64%4.43%5.06%4.76%
MGRDX
MFS International Growth Fund R6
5.40%5.63%6.35%2.90%3.06%6.97%0.80%1.51%4.20%2.61%1.45%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGRDX and JEMDX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGRDX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to JEMDX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGRDX dropped -60.75% vs JEMDX's -38.84%.

JEMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGRDX and JEMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer