MGRDX vs. FSGGX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS International Growth Fund R6 (MGRDX) and Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX).
MGRDX is an actively managed fund by MFS. It was launched on May 1, 2006. FSGGX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Index. It was launched on Aug 9, 2011.
Performance
MGRDX vs. FSGGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGRDX vs. FSGGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGRDX MFS International Growth Fund R6 | -6.04% | 21.18% | 9.22% | 14.99% | -15.00% | 9.61% | 15.82% | 27.32% | -8.79% | 32.56% |
FSGGX Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund | -1.18% | 32.93% | 5.30% | 15.57% | -15.75% | 7.74% | 10.73% | 21.36% | -13.93% | 24.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGRDX achieves a -6.04% return, which is significantly lower than FSGGX's -1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, MGRDX has outperformed FSGGX with an annualized return of 9.26%, while FSGGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.09% annualized return.
MGRDX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -12.25%
- YTD
- -6.04%
- 6M
- -4.72%
- 1Y
- 9.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
FSGGX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -11.05%
- YTD
- -1.18%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGRDX vs. FSGGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGRDX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FSGGX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGRDX vs. FSGGX — Risk / Return Rank
MGRDX
FSGGX
MGRDX vs. FSGGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Growth Fund R6 (MGRDX) and Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGRDX | FSGGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 1.42 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 1.93 | -1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.29 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 1.89 | -1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | 7.45 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGRDX | FSGGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 1.42 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.46 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.50 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.43 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGRDX and FSGGX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGRDX vs. FSGGX - Dividend Comparison
MGRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than FSGGX's 2.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGRDX MFS International Growth Fund R6 | 5.99% | 5.63% | 6.35% | 2.90% | 3.06% | 6.97% | 0.80% | 1.51% | 4.20% | 2.61% | 1.45% | 1.20% |
FSGGX Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund | 2.73% | 2.70% | 2.91% | 2.95% | 2.64% | 2.60% | 1.71% | 2.85% | 2.66% | 0.22% | 0.05% | 2.44% |
Drawdowns
MGRDX vs. FSGGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGRDX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, which is greater than FSGGX's maximum drawdown of -34.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGRDX and FSGGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGRDX | FSGGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.75% | -34.76% | -25.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.39% | -11.26% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.60% | -29.70% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.60% | -34.76% | +4.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.25% | -11.26% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.49% | -7.41% | -5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.85% | +0.23% |
Volatility
MGRDX vs. FSGGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS International Growth Fund R6 (MGRDX) is 5.78%, while Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) has a volatility of 7.25%. This indicates that MGRDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSGGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGRDX | FSGGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 7.25% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 10.84% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 16.10% | -1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 15.10% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 16.09% | -0.41% |