MGRDX vs. FAOSX
MGRDX (MFS International Growth Fund R6) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MGRDX returned 5.50%/yr vs 3.48%/yr for FAOSX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGRDX charges 0.72%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
MGRDX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MGRDX
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- -0.19%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 11.21%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -1.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- —
MGRDX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGRDX MFS International Growth Fund R6 | 0.27% | 21.18% | 9.22% | 14.99% | -15.00% | 9.61% | 15.82% | 27.32% | -8.79% | 28.25% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.73% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGRDX and FAOSX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.89 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGRDX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGRDX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
MGRDX
FAOSX
MGRDX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Growth Fund R6 (MGRDX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGRDX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.99 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | -0.09 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.07 | -0.14 | +2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGRDX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGRDX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, which is greater than FAOSX's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGRDX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGRDX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.75% | -36.24% | -24.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.39% | -7.26% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | -13.96% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.60% | -36.24% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -5.86% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.41% | -7.92% | -4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 4.15% | -0.31% |
Volatility
MGRDX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
MFS International Growth Fund R6 (MGRDX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MGRDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGRDX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 0.00% | +5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.76% | 3.63% | +8.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 8.75% | +5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 16.71% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 16.64% | -0.99% |
MGRDX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGRDX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGRDX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
MGRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGRDX MFS International Growth Fund R6 | 5.61% | 5.63% | 6.35% | 2.90% | 3.06% | 6.97% | 0.80% | 1.51% | 4.20% | 2.61% | 1.45% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGRDX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGRDX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGRDX dropped -60.75% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
MGRDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGRDX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer