PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGOYX vs. SGFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGOYX vs. SGFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund (MGOYX) and Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGOYX achieves a 19.75% return, which is significantly higher than SGFFX's 2.50% return. Over the past 10 years, MGOYX has underperformed SGFFX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while SGFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.01% annualized return.


MGOYX

1D
0.49%
1M
1.70%
YTD
19.75%
6M
19.27%
1Y
29.84%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
11.09%

SGFFX

1D
-0.87%
1M
2.75%
YTD
2.50%
6M
1.38%
1Y
11.53%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*
16.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGOYX vs. SGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGOYX
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund
19.75%12.03%10.93%14.82%-21.31%25.97%20.61%26.22%-14.19%24.55%
SGFFX
Sparrow Growth Fund
2.50%14.31%34.81%17.02%-23.36%-11.00%97.83%27.24%6.26%31.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MGOYX and SGFFX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999

0.82

The correlation between MGOYX and SGFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGOYX vs. SGFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGOYX
MGOYX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MGOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MGOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SGFFX
SGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGOYX vs. SGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund (MGOYX) and Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGOYXSGFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.16

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

0.78

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.76

2.61

+12.15

MGOYX vs. SGFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGOYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the SGFFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGOYX and SGFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGOYXSGFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

0.92

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.25

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.57

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.28

+0.18

Drawdowns

MGOYX vs. SGFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGOYX drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, smaller than the maximum SGFFX drawdown of -62.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGOYX and SGFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGOYXSGFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.23%

-62.10%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-15.33%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

-39.29%

+13.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-40.24%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.49%

-50.45%

+9.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-16.74%

+16.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.96%

-22.17%

+11.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

4.58%

-2.56%

Volatility

MGOYX vs. SGFFX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund (MGOYX) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX) at 2.84%. This indicates that MGOYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGOYXSGFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

2.84%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

9.85%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

12.96%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.06%

27.11%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.26%

27.98%

-4.72%

MGOYX vs. SGFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGOYX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than SGFFX's 1.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGOYX vs. SGFFX - Dividend Comparison

MGOYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.84%, while SGFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGOYX
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund
12.84%15.37%15.72%4.54%12.23%25.13%18.63%60.72%49.01%19.34%12.76%10.52%
SGFFX
Sparrow Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%18.67%0.00%0.67%1.33%5.84%7.33%0.00%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGOYX and SGFFX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGOYX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to SGFFX (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGOYX dropped -57.23% vs SGFFX's -62.10%.

MGOYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGOYX and SGFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer