PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGOYX vs. FSMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGOYX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund (MGOYX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGOYX achieves a 19.17% return, which is significantly higher than FSMAX's 14.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MGOYX has underperformed FSMAX with an annualized return of 11.03%, while FSMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.


MGOYX

1D
0.99%
1M
2.80%
YTD
19.17%
6M
18.86%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
11.03%

FSMAX

1D
1.07%
1M
5.80%
YTD
14.89%
6M
13.61%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGOYX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGOYX
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund
19.17%12.03%10.93%14.82%-21.31%25.97%20.61%26.22%-14.19%24.55%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
14.89%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MGOYX and FSMAX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.93

The correlation between MGOYX and FSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGOYX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGOYX
MGOYX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MGOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MGOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGOYX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund (MGOYX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGOYXFSMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

1.87

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.05

2.60

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

3.12

+0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.85

11.05

+3.80

MGOYX vs. FSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGOYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the FSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGOYX and FSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGOYXFSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.87

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.31

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.40

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.46

0.00

Drawdowns

MGOYX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGOYX drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than FSMAX's maximum drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGOYX and FSMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGOYXFSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.23%

-50.55%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-10.26%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

-26.82%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-36.31%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.49%

-50.55%

+10.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.96%

-12.17%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.90%

-0.88%

Volatility

MGOYX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund (MGOYX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGOYXFSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

4.70%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

12.46%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

17.17%

-3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.06%

22.33%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.26%

30.24%

-6.98%

MGOYX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGOYX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGOYX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison

MGOYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.90%, more than FSMAX's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%
MGOYX
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund
12.90%15.37%15.72%4.54%12.23%25.13%18.63%60.72%49.01%19.34%12.76%10.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGOYX and FSMAX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMAX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to MGOYX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGOYX dropped -57.23% vs FSMAX's -50.55%.

MGOYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGOYX and FSMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer