MGMT vs. DBO
MGMT (Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MGMT is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Inverdale Capital Management LLC, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. MGMT is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MGMT returned 7.20%/yr vs 15.36%/yr for DBO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGMT charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
MGMT vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGMT achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.
MGMT
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 28.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 79.84%
- 6M
- 74.51%
- 1Y
- 77.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
MGMT vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGMT Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF | 11.12% | 6.96% | 12.95% | 17.87% | -14.54% | 40.77% | 5.36% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 79.84% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGMT and DBO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020 | 0.19 |
The correlation between MGMT and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MGMT vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGMT
DBO
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
MGMT
DBO
-
Energy
MGMT
DBO
-
Technology
MGMT
DBO
-
Basic Materials
MGMT
DBO
-
Financial Services
MGMT
DBO
Consumer Cyclical
MGMT
DBO
-
Healthcare
MGMT
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
MGMT
DBO
-
Communication Services
MGMT
DBO
-
Real Estate
MGMT
DBO
-
Utilities
MGMT
-
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGMT vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
MGMT
DBO
MGMT vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGMT | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 4.28 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 8.69 | -1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGMT | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 2.25 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.48 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.02 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
MGMT vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGMT drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGMT and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGMT | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.95% | -90.18% | +65.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -18.19% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.76% | -28.20% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.95% | -37.68% | +12.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -52.68% | +51.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.74% | -62.25% | +55.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 8.94% | -4.89% |
Volatility
MGMT vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) is 4.17%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that MGMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGMT | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 12.79% | -8.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 28.32% | -16.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 34.58% | -17.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 32.31% | -12.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 31.79% | -12.22% |
MGMT vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGMT has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGMT vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
MGMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than DBO's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.95% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
MGMT Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF | 0.31% | 0.34% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.90% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGMT and DBO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to MGMT (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGMT dropped -24.95% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.36% vs 7.20% for MGMT. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, MGMT has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.36% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MGMT.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.31% for MGMT.
MGMT is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Inverdale Capital Management LLC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for MGMT and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGMT and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer