MGMT vs. AVSC

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MGMT (Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF) and AVSC (Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGMT is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Inverdale Capital Management LLC, while AVSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis Investors. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MGMT returned 12.56%/yr vs 17.05%/yr for AVSC. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGMT charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVSC.

Performance

MGMT vs. AVSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGMT achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than AVSC's 23.67% return.

MGMT

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 6.23%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 1Y: 22.77%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: —

AVSC

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 1.53%
• 6M: 17.05%
• YTD: 23.67%
• 1Y: 36.24%
• 3Y*: 17.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGMT vs. AVSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MGMT Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF	13.33%	6.96%	12.95%	17.87%	-14.86%
AVSC Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF	23.67%	9.42%	7.75%	19.68%	-12.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MGMT and AVSC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022	0.92

The correlation between MGMT and AVSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MGMT vs. AVSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGMT

MGMT Risk / Return Rank: 46
MGMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MGMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
MGMT Omega Ratio Rank: 43
MGMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MGMT Martin Ratio Rank: 44

AVSC

AVSC Risk / Return Rank: 84
AVSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AVSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AVSC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
AVSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AVSC Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGMT vs. AVSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGMT	AVSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	2.04	-0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.96	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.35	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	4.61	-2.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.63	14.49	-8.85

MGMT vs. AVSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the AVSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGMT and AVSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGMT vs. AVSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGMT drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum AVSC drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGMT and AVSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGMT	AVSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.95%	-28.40%	+3.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.32%	-7.89%	-4.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.76%	-28.40%	+4.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-1.40%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.64%	-7.28%	+0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	2.51%	+1.54%

Volatility

MGMT vs. AVSC - Volatility Comparison

Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC) at 4.10%. This indicates that MGMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGMT	AVSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	4.10%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.06%	11.90%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.39%	17.86%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.48%	22.19%	-2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.49%	22.19%	-2.70%

MGMT vs. AVSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGMT has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AVSC's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGMT vs. AVSC - Dividend Comparison

MGMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than AVSC's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVSC Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF	0.93%	1.16%	1.17%	1.42%	1.10%	0.00%
MGMT Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF	0.30%	0.34%	0.51%	1.16%	0.90%	0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGMT and AVSC in my portfolio?

MGMT and AVSC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGMT or AVSC?

MGMT has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to AVSC (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGMT dropped -24.95% vs AVSC's -28.40%.

Which ETF is better, MGMT or AVSC?

On 3-year performance, AVSC leads with 17.05% vs 12.56% for MGMT. On fees, AVSC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MGMT or AVSC?

Over the 3-year period, AVSC has performed better with a 17.05% return vs 12.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MGMT or AVSC?

AVSC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MGMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MGMT or AVSC?

AVSC has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.30% for MGMT.

What is the main difference between MGMT and AVSC?

MGMT is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while AVSC is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Inverdale Capital Management LLC and Avantis Investors. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for MGMT and 0.25% for AVSC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.