MGLIX vs. MINIX
MGLIX (MFS Global Real Estate Fund) and MINIX (MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - MGLIX is a REIT fund managed by MFS, while MINIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 10 years, MGLIX returned 3.90%/yr vs 10.30%/yr for MINIX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGLIX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for MINIX.
Performance
MGLIX vs. MINIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGLIX achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly higher than MINIX's 6.13% return. Over the past 10 years, MGLIX has underperformed MINIX with an annualized return of 3.90%, while MINIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.30% annualized return.
MGLIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 7.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- -0.19%
- 10Y*
- 3.90%
MINIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 6.13%
- 6M
- 5.93%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
MGLIX vs. MINIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGLIX MFS Global Real Estate Fund | 6.96% | 3.60% | -2.85% | 11.32% | -26.94% | 29.71% | 2.18% | 26.29% | -3.68% | 10.26% |
MINIX MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I | 6.13% | 33.06% | 7.35% | 18.04% | -23.05% | 10.55% | 20.45% | 25.90% | -9.02% | 27.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGLIX and MINIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2009 | 0.68 |
The correlation between MGLIX and MINIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGLIX vs. MINIX — Risk / Return Rank
MGLIX
MINIX
MGLIX vs. MINIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Real Estate Fund (MGLIX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGLIX | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.25 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 1.64 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 5.75 | -3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGLIX vs. MINIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGLIX drawdown since its inception was -38.55%, smaller than the maximum MINIX drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGLIX and MINIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGLIX | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.55% | -51.72% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.69% | -12.42% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -13.59% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.01% | -36.78% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.55% | -36.78% | -1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.45% | -3.33% | -9.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.73% | -8.60% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 3.54% | -0.57% |
Volatility
MGLIX vs. MINIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Global Real Estate Fund (MGLIX) is 4.11%, while MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that MGLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGLIX | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 5.17% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 11.80% | -2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 14.41% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 16.73% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 15.65% | +1.19% |
MGLIX vs. MINIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGLIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than MINIX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGLIX vs. MINIX - Dividend Comparison
MGLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than MINIX's 7.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGLIX MFS Global Real Estate Fund | 3.03% | 3.24% | 2.59% | 1.86% | 5.97% | 2.12% | 1.00% | 5.79% | 3.15% | 1.87% | 5.62% | 7.40% |
MINIX MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I | 7.32% | 7.77% | 12.02% | 11.21% | 13.90% | 7.25% | 5.25% | 3.94% | 4.49% | 2.62% | 1.82% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGLIX and MINIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MINIX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to MGLIX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGLIX dropped -38.55% vs MINIX's -51.72%.
MINIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGLIX and MINIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer