PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGLIX vs. MINIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGLIX vs. MINIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Global Real Estate Fund (MGLIX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGLIX achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly higher than MINIX's 6.13% return. Over the past 10 years, MGLIX has underperformed MINIX with an annualized return of 3.90%, while MINIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.30% annualized return.


MGLIX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
6.96%
6M
7.50%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
-0.19%
10Y*
3.90%

MINIX

1D
0.34%
1M
0.20%
YTD
6.13%
6M
5.93%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
10.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGLIX vs. MINIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGLIX
MFS Global Real Estate Fund
6.96%3.60%-2.85%11.32%-26.94%29.71%2.18%26.29%-3.68%10.26%
MINIX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I
6.13%33.06%7.35%18.04%-23.05%10.55%20.45%25.90%-9.02%27.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MGLIX and MINIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2009

0.68

The correlation between MGLIX and MINIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGLIX vs. MINIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGLIX
MGLIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MGLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MGLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MINIX
MINIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MINIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MINIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGLIX vs. MINIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Real Estate Fund (MGLIX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGLIXMINIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.25

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.64

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

5.75

-3.13

MGLIX vs. MINIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the MINIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGLIX and MINIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGLIX vs. MINIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGLIX drawdown since its inception was -38.55%, smaller than the maximum MINIX drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGLIX and MINIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGLIXMINIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.55%

-51.72%

+13.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-12.42%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-13.59%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.01%

-36.78%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.55%

-36.78%

-1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.45%

-3.33%

-9.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-8.60%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.54%

-0.57%

Volatility

MGLIX vs. MINIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Global Real Estate Fund (MGLIX) is 4.11%, while MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that MGLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGLIXMINIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

5.17%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

11.80%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

14.41%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

16.73%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

15.65%

+1.19%

MGLIX vs. MINIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGLIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than MINIX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGLIX vs. MINIX - Dividend Comparison

MGLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than MINIX's 7.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGLIX
MFS Global Real Estate Fund
3.03%3.24%2.59%1.86%5.97%2.12%1.00%5.79%3.15%1.87%5.62%7.40%
MINIX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I
7.32%7.77%12.02%11.21%13.90%7.25%5.25%3.94%4.49%2.62%1.82%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGLIX and MINIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MINIX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to MGLIX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGLIX dropped -38.55% vs MINIX's -51.72%.

MINIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGLIX and MINIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer