PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGF vs. VSBSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGF vs. VSBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Government Markets Income Trust (MGF) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGF achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly lower than VSBSX's 0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MGF has underperformed VSBSX with an annualized return of 1.37%, while VSBSX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.73% annualized return.


MGF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
YTD
-2.10%
6M
-0.29%
1Y
0.15%
3Y*
3.60%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
1.37%

VSBSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.56%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
1.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGF vs. VSBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGF
MFS Government Markets Income Trust
-2.10%6.24%4.17%3.78%-15.81%-0.22%7.80%10.32%1.33%2.62%
VSBSX
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.45%5.08%4.39%4.23%-3.87%-0.69%3.09%3.51%1.52%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between MGF and VSBSX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

0.16

The correlation between MGF and VSBSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGF vs. VSBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGF
MGF Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
MGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGF Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGF Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

VSBSX
VSBSX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VSBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VSBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGF vs. VSBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Government Markets Income Trust (MGF) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGFVSBSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.52

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

3.84

-3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.06

15.35

-15.29

MGF vs. VSBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGF Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the VSBSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGF and VSBSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGF vs. VSBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, which is greater than VSBSX's maximum drawdown of -5.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGF and VSBSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGFVSBSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-5.77%

-29.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.05%

-0.84%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.94%

-0.84%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.88%

-5.77%

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.88%

-5.77%

-17.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-0.27%

-6.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.87%

-0.59%

-10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

0.21%

+2.60%

Volatility

MGF vs. VSBSX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Government Markets Income Trust (MGF) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSBSX) at 0.50%. This indicates that MGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGFVSBSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

0.50%

+3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.68%

0.94%

+6.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

1.31%

+9.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.32%

1.96%

+9.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.19%

1.54%

+8.65%

MGF vs. VSBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGF has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VSBSX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGF vs. VSBSX - Dividend Comparison

MGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than VSBSX's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGF
MFS Government Markets Income Trust
8.03%7.65%7.81%7.82%8.45%7.71%7.58%7.50%7.81%7.92%8.09%8.05%
VSBSX
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.85%3.98%4.50%3.29%1.12%0.63%1.72%2.26%1.80%1.10%0.76%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGF and VSBSX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGF has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to VSBSX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGF dropped -35.74% vs VSBSX's -5.77%.

VSBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGF and VSBSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer