MGEMX vs. BADEX
MGEMX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio) and BADEX (BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MGEMX returned -5.97%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for BADEX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MGEMX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for BADEX.
Performance
MGEMX vs. BADEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGEMX achieves a 23.22% return, which is significantly higher than BADEX's 14.65% return.
MGEMX
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- 6M
- 13.22%
- YTD
- 23.22%
- 1Y
- -28.33%
- 3Y*
- -3.74%
- 5Y*
- -5.97%
- 10Y*
- 2.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.67%
BADEX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- YTD
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 21.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MGEMX vs. BADEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGEMX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio | 23.22% | -34.08% | 8.07% | 12.16% | -25.07% | 3.53% | 2.60% |
BADEX BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund | 14.65% | 13.95% | 10.15% | 11.67% | -11.34% | 4.49% | 2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGEMX and BADEX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MGEMX and BADEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGEMX vs. BADEX — Risk / Return Rank
MGEMX
BADEX
MGEMX vs. BADEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio (MGEMX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGEMX | BADEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.31 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 2.30 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 7.64 | -8.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGEMX vs. BADEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGEMX drawdown since its inception was -64.93%, which is greater than BADEX's maximum drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGEMX and BADEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGEMX | BADEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.93% | -21.86% | -43.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.50% | -8.89% | -43.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.50% | -8.89% | -43.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.50% | -20.57% | -31.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.67% | -5.27% | -33.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.90% | -5.56% | -14.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.27% | 2.67% | +30.60% |
Volatility
MGEMX vs. BADEX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio (MGEMX) has a higher volatility of 11.16% compared to BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX) at 6.00%. This indicates that MGEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BADEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGEMX | BADEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.16% | 6.00% | +5.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.85% | 12.54% | +11.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.30% | 13.37% | +43.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.83% | 10.85% | +18.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 10.91% | +14.26% |
MGEMX vs. BADEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGEMX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BADEX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGEMX vs. BADEX - Dividend Comparison
MGEMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BADEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BADEX BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund | 11.48% | 7.52% | 2.27% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 7.54% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGEMX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.27% | 2.48% | 4.48% | 9.05% | 1.07% | 26.00% | 2.46% | 0.60% | 0.82% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGEMX and BADEX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGEMX has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to BADEX (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGEMX dropped -64.93% vs BADEX's -21.86%.
BADEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGEMX and BADEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer