MGBLX vs. TPINX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MGBLX (MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2) and TPINX (Templeton Global Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, MGBLX returned 1.57%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TPINX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGBLX charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for TPINX.

Performance

MGBLX vs. TPINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2 (MGBLX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGBLX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than TPINX's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MGBLX has outperformed TPINX with an annualized return of 1.57%, while TPINX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.13% annualized return.

MGBLX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: 4.18%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: 1.57%

TPINX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.49%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 5.44%
• 3Y*: 2.00%
• 5Y*: -1.02%
• 10Y*: 0.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGBLX vs. TPINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MGBLX MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2	0.31%	5.38%	1.81%	7.69%	-11.57%	-3.48%	10.52%	7.91%	-2.66%	7.22%
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund	1.43%	15.02%	-11.95%	2.45%	-6.17%	-5.06%	-4.41%	0.63%	1.26%	2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MGBLX and TPINX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010	0.14

Over the past year, MGBLX and TPINX have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

MGBLX vs. TPINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGBLX

MGBLX Risk / Return Rank: 16
MGBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
MGBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
MGBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
MGBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MGBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

TPINX

TPINX Risk / Return Rank: 10
TPINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
TPINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
TPINX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TPINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
TPINX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGBLX vs. TPINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2 (MGBLX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MGBLX	TPINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	0.78	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	1.15	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.14	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	0.88	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	2.87	+0.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MGBLX vs. TPINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGBLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the TPINX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGBLX and TPINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MGBLX	TPINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	0.78	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	-0.13	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.02	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.77	-0.47

Drawdowns

MGBLX vs. TPINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGBLX drawdown since its inception was -18.71%, smaller than the maximum TPINX drawdown of -26.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGBLX and TPINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGBLX	TPINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.71%	-26.45%	+7.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.25%	-6.36%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.74%	-13.03%	+7.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.10%	-19.15%	+2.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.71%	-26.45%	+7.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-13.66%	+12.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-4.84%	-1.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	1.95%	-0.88%

Volatility

MGBLX vs. TPINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2 (MGBLX) is 1.34%, while Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that MGBLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGBLX	TPINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.34%	2.21%	-0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.78%	5.97%	-3.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.42%	7.24%	-3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.29%	8.13%	-3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.65%	7.27%	-2.62%

MGBLX vs. TPINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGBLX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TPINX's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGBLX vs. TPINX - Dividend Comparison

MGBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than TPINX's 5.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGBLX MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2	4.25%	4.01%	2.53%	1.55%	2.99%	4.72%	3.15%	1.81%	1.66%	1.08%	1.15%	1.63%
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund	5.06%	4.29%	5.77%	3.87%	5.17%	5.38%	4.59%	6.12%	6.53%	3.34%	2.33%	3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGBLX and TPINX in my portfolio?

MGBLX and TPINX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGBLX or TPINX?

TPINX has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to MGBLX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGBLX dropped -18.71% vs TPINX's -26.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.