MFSV vs. VTV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MFSV (MFS Active Value ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. MFSV is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past year, MFSV returned 16.94% vs 28.84% for VTV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFSV charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

MFSV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFSV achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 15.12% return.

MFSV

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 7.70%
• 6M: 7.14%
• 1Y: 16.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTV

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: 15.12%
• 6M: 14.64%
• 1Y: 28.84%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 12.52%
• 10Y*: 13.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFSV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MFSV MFS Active Value ETF	7.70%	13.63%	-4.62%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	15.12%	15.27%	-4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MFSV and VTV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024	0.93

The correlation between MFSV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MFSV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFSV

MFSV Risk / Return Rank: 51
MFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
MFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 54

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 87
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFSV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFSV	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.79	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	3.97	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.50	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	4.56	-1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.20	17.20	-8.00

MFSV vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFSV Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFSV and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MFSV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSV drawdown since its inception was -12.74%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSV and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFSV	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.74%	-59.27%	+46.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.34%	-6.35%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	0.00%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-7.85%	+5.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	1.68%	+0.17%

Volatility

MFSV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is 3.15%, while Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that MFSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFSV	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	3.32%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.81%	7.82%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.49%	10.39%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.70%	13.88%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.70%	16.69%	-2.99%

MFSV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSV has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFSV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

MFSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than VTV's 1.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MFSV MFS Active Value ETF	1.46%	1.53%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.82%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFSV and VTV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, MFSV and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MFSV or VTV?

VTV has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to MFSV (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSV dropped -12.74% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which ETF is better, MFSV or VTV?

On 1-year performance, VTV leads with 28.84% vs 16.94% for MFSV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MFSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MFSV or VTV?

Over the 1-year period, VTV has performed better with a 28.84% return vs 16.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFSV or VTV?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for MFSV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFSV or VTV?

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.46% for MFSV.

What is the main difference between MFSV and VTV?

They also come from different issuers: MFS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for MFSV and 0.04% for VTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.