MFSV vs. PRXV
MFSV (MFS Active Value ETF) and PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFSV charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PRXV.
Performance
MFSV vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MFSV
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRXV
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFSV vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MFSV MFS Active Value ETF | -0.58% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFSV and PRXV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFSV vs. PRXV — Risk / Return Rank
MFSV
PRXV
MFSV vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFSV | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.96 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFSV | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 4.54 | -3.90 |
Drawdowns
MFSV vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFSV drawdown since its inception was -12.74%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSV and PRXV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFSV | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.74% | -1.18% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -0.03% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -0.32% | -1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | — | — |
Volatility
MFSV vs. PRXV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFSV | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.21% | 9.66% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 9.66% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 9.66% | +4.07% |
MFSV vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFSV has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFSV vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison
MFSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MFSV MFS Active Value ETF | 1.51% | 1.53% | 0.11% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFSV and PRXV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for MFSV.
MFSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.
They also come from different issuers: MFS and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for MFSV and 0.36% for PRXV.
Find the right allocation for MFSV and PRXV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer