MFSSX vs. MEIIX
MFSSX (MFS Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund) and MEIIX (MFS Value Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - MFSSX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by MFS, while MEIIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 10 years, MFSSX returned 1.78%/yr vs 10.13%/yr for MEIIX. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. MFSSX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MEIIX.
Performance
MFSSX vs. MEIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFSSX achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than MEIIX's 6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MFSSX has underperformed MEIIX with an annualized return of 1.78%, while MEIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.13% annualized return.
MFSSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 7.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
MEIIX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 5.75%
- 1Y
- 15.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
MFSSX vs. MEIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFSSX MFS Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund | 2.16% | 4.04% | 1.94% | 5.59% | -10.79% | 2.02% | 3.71% | 7.56% | 0.77% | 4.86% |
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I | 6.49% | 13.26% | 11.86% | 8.21% | -6.02% | 25.43% | 3.99% | 30.04% | -9.90% | 17.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFSSX and MEIIX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996 | -0.08 |
The correlation between MFSSX and MEIIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFSSX vs. MEIIX — Risk / Return Rank
MFSSX
MEIIX
MFSSX vs. MEIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (MFSSX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFSSX | MEIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.27 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.39 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | 8.24 | +1.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFSSX vs. MEIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFSSX drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum MEIIX drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSSX and MEIIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFSSX | MEIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -52.64% | +35.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.72% | -6.76% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.64% | -13.19% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.13% | -17.58% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.13% | -36.70% | +20.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.42% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -6.54% | +4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 1.96% | -1.21% |
Volatility
MFSSX vs. MEIIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (MFSSX) is 0.80%, while MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that MFSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFSSX | MEIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 3.21% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.14% | 7.88% | -5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85% | 10.64% | -7.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.23% | 13.94% | -9.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.35% | 16.57% | -12.22% |
MFSSX vs. MEIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFSSX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIIX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFSSX vs. MEIIX - Dividend Comparison
MFSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than MEIIX's 9.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I | 9.13% | 9.52% | 9.30% | 8.41% | 7.58% | 3.32% | 2.63% | 3.17% | 3.62% | 4.04% | 2.91% | 5.97% |
MFSSX MFS Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund | 3.21% | 4.20% | 2.81% | 2.43% | 1.84% | 1.91% | 2.44% | 3.27% | 3.42% | 3.74% | 3.64% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFSSX and MEIIX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MEIIX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to MFSSX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSSX dropped -17.05% vs MEIIX's -52.64%.
MFSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFSSX and MEIIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer