PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFSCX vs. NRK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFSCX vs. NRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS South Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (MFSCX) and Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFSCX achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly lower than NRK's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MFSCX has underperformed NRK with an annualized return of 1.58%, while NRK has yielded a comparatively higher 2.37% annualized return.


MFSCX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.94%
YTD
2.10%
6M
2.58%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
0.46%
10Y*
1.58%

NRK

1D
0.38%
1M
3.94%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.68%
1Y
18.60%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
2.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFSCX vs. NRK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFSCX
MFS South Carolina Municipal Bond Fund
2.10%4.22%1.97%5.59%-11.11%1.77%4.03%6.75%1.03%4.33%
NRK
Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income
9.70%4.74%5.93%7.03%-21.84%6.24%4.08%21.43%-5.98%6.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MFSCX and NRK is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2003

0.28

The correlation between MFSCX and NRK shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.52 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFSCX vs. NRK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFSCX
MFSCX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MFSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

NRK
NRK Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRK Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRK Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFSCX vs. NRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS South Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (MFSCX) and Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFSCXNRKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.43

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.51

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.40

9.37

-0.97

MFSCX vs. NRK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the NRK Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFSCX and NRK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFSCX vs. NRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSCX drawdown since its inception was -16.34%, smaller than the maximum NRK drawdown of -40.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSCX and NRK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFSCXNRKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.34%

-40.18%

+23.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-5.32%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.51%

-12.67%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.34%

-31.06%

+14.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.34%

-31.06%

+14.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-1.01%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-8.17%

+5.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.99%

-1.07%

Volatility

MFSCX vs. NRK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS South Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (MFSCX) is 0.90%, while Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that MFSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFSCXNRKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

3.31%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

6.66%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26%

8.51%

-5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.52%

9.95%

-5.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

10.35%

-6.20%

MFSCX vs. NRK - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSCX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than NRK's 2.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFSCX vs. NRK - Dividend Comparison

MFSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than NRK's 7.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFSCX
MFS South Carolina Municipal Bond Fund
3.44%4.42%2.86%2.31%1.61%1.60%2.20%3.00%3.13%3.06%3.16%3.19%
NRK
Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income
7.75%8.21%6.74%4.06%5.41%4.18%4.15%3.98%4.68%4.85%5.37%5.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFSCX and NRK have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRK has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to MFSCX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSCX dropped -16.34% vs NRK's -40.18%.

MFSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFSCX and NRK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer