PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFPAX vs. NPV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFPAX vs. NPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund (MFPAX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFPAX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than NPV's 1.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MFPAX has outperformed NPV with an annualized return of 1.92%, while NPV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.50% annualized return.


MFPAX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.97%
6M
0.19%
YTD
0.69%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
1.92%
ALL TIME*
4.18%

NPV

1D
-0.55%
1M
-5.83%
6M
-1.18%
YTD
1.46%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
-3.35%
10Y*
1.50%
ALL TIME*
4.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$741.86K$696.68K$526.14K

MFPAX vs. NPV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFPAX
MFS Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund
0.69%4.65%2.83%4.90%-10.76%2.64%4.54%7.69%1.44%5.16%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
1.46%-5.91%24.61%0.42%-31.53%10.93%13.15%29.60%-4.42%3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MFPAX and NPV is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994

0.19

The correlation between MFPAX and NPV shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFPAX vs. NPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFPAX
MFPAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MFPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MFPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NPV
NPV Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPV Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFPAX vs. NPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund (MFPAX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFPAXNPVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.15

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

0.95

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.11

3.15

+4.95

MFPAX vs. NPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the NPV Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFPAX and NPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFPAX vs. NPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFPAX drawdown since its inception was -16.26%, smaller than the maximum NPV drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFPAX and NPV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFPAXNPVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.26%

-44.25%

+27.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-6.15%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.23%

-18.29%

+12.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.25%

-44.25%

+28.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.26%

-44.25%

+27.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-19.99%

+18.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-10.21%

+8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

1.85%

-1.01%

Volatility

MFPAX vs. NPV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund (MFPAX) is 0.98%, while Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) has a volatility of 2.19%. This indicates that MFPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFPAXNPVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

2.19%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

5.24%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

7.19%

-4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.31%

13.46%

-9.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

13.15%

-9.01%

MFPAX vs. NPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFPAX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than NPV's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFPAX vs. NPV - Dividend Comparison

MFPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than NPV's 7.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFPAX
MFS Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund
3.22%4.47%3.00%2.63%1.92%2.04%2.68%3.48%3.60%3.65%3.63%3.72%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.22%7.55%5.63%3.89%5.08%3.42%3.49%3.58%4.62%4.40%4.87%5.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFPAX and NPV have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NPV has higher volatility (2.19%) compared to MFPAX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFPAX dropped -16.26% vs NPV's -44.25%.

MFPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFPAX and NPV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer