PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFOCX vs. FTQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFOCX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marsico Focus Fund (MFOCX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFOCX achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 32.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MFOCX has underperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 18.89%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.05% annualized return.


MFOCX

1D
-0.68%
1M
0.59%
YTD
9.46%
6M
8.15%
1Y
18.28%
3Y*
27.22%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
18.89%

FTQGX

1D
0.22%
1M
9.32%
YTD
32.36%
6M
30.89%
1Y
55.95%
3Y*
31.26%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
20.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFOCX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFOCX
Marsico Focus Fund
9.46%12.47%49.61%45.25%-33.36%20.23%47.52%32.33%0.23%34.20%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
32.36%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MFOCX and FTQGX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1997

0.91

The correlation between MFOCX and FTQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFOCX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFOCX
MFOCX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MFOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MFOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFOCX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsico Focus Fund (MFOCX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFOCXFTQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.46

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

4.51

-2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

18.97

-12.24

MFOCX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFOCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFOCX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFOCX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFOCX drawdown since its inception was -54.96%, smaller than the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFOCX and FTQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFOCXFTQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.96%

-61.29%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.44%

-12.76%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.56%

-26.84%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.76%

-32.31%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.76%

-32.31%

-4.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

0.00%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.89%

-14.17%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.03%

-0.06%

Volatility

MFOCX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marsico Focus Fund (MFOCX) is 6.58%, while Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a volatility of 8.87%. This indicates that MFOCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFOCXFTQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

8.87%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

16.95%

-3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.41%

21.35%

-3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.75%

21.95%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

21.72%

+0.37%

MFOCX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFOCX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFOCX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

MFOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.27%, more than FTQGX's 9.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
9.40%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%
MFOCX
Marsico Focus Fund
16.27%17.81%11.96%2.18%18.06%11.66%8.36%7.90%11.58%18.67%0.00%24.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFOCX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTQGX has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to MFOCX (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFOCX dropped -54.96% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFOCX and FTQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer