PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFLX vs. VTEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFLX vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFLX achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than VTEB's 0.43% return.


MFLX

1D
0.06%
1M
-2.41%
6M
1.15%
YTD
2.04%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
5.44%
5Y*
-0.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.98%

VTEB

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.72%
6M
-0.22%
YTD
0.43%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
3.19%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
1.90%
ALL TIME*
2.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$151.38K$128.71K$117.14K
$388.01M$356.14M$359.95M

MFLX vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFLX
First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF
2.04%3.94%3.74%8.98%-19.94%8.43%7.19%16.89%-4.66%5.57%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
0.43%3.72%1.31%6.15%-7.99%1.14%5.19%7.35%1.04%4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between MFLX and VTEB is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016

0.37

Over the past year, MFLX and VTEB have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFLX vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFLX
MFLX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VTEB
VTEB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFLX vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFLXVTEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.82

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

5.96

+3.17

MFLX vs. VTEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the VTEB Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFLX and VTEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFLX vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFLX drawdown since its inception was -26.76%, which is greater than VTEB's maximum drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFLX and VTEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFLXVTEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.76%

-17.00%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.71%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.36%

-4.76%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

-12.56%

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.98%

-1.74%

-3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-2.30%

-5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.82%

+0.01%

Volatility

MFLX vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB) at 0.88%. This indicates that MFLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFLXVTEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

0.88%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

2.22%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

2.73%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.34%

3.92%

+6.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.21%

5.25%

+5.96%

MFLX vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFLX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFLX vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison

MFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than VTEB's 3.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFLX
First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF
4.20%4.06%3.81%3.65%4.27%3.69%3.21%2.94%3.74%3.80%0.98%0.00%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.43%3.29%3.14%2.79%2.09%1.64%1.99%2.30%2.25%1.96%1.66%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFLX and VTEB have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFLX has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to VTEB (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFLX dropped -26.76% vs VTEB's -17.00%.

On 5-year performance, VTEB leads with 0.54% vs -0.97% for MFLX. On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTEB has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTEB has performed better with a 0.54% return vs -0.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for MFLX.

MFLX has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 3.43% for VTEB.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for MFLX and 0.03% for VTEB.

MFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFLX and VTEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer