PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFLX vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFLX vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFLX achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return.


MFLX

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.21%
YTD
3.33%
6M
3.84%
1Y
9.22%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*

NFTY

1D
-1.34%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
-9.70%
6M
-7.99%
1Y
-8.48%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFLX vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFLX
First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF
3.33%3.94%3.74%8.98%-19.94%8.43%7.19%16.89%-4.66%5.57%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-9.70%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MFLX and NFTY is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2016

0.07

The correlation between MFLX and NFTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (3 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MFLX vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFLX
NFTY

Financial Services

15.2%
21.2%

Basic Materials

-

12.5%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

16.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.3%

Energy

-

8.5%

Healthcare

-

9.7%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

9.2%

Utilities

-

4.0%

Financial Services

MFLX
15.2%
NFTY
21.2%

Basic Materials

MFLX

-

NFTY
12.5%

Communication Services

MFLX

-

NFTY
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MFLX

-

NFTY
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

MFLX

-

NFTY
8.3%

Energy

MFLX

-

NFTY
8.5%

Healthcare

MFLX

-

NFTY
9.7%

Industrials

MFLX

-

NFTY
8.3%

Real Estate

MFLX

-

NFTY

-

Technology

MFLX

-

NFTY
9.2%

Utilities

MFLX

-

NFTY
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFLX vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFLX
MFLX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFLX vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFLXNFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

0.91

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

-0.53

+3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.95

-1.39

+13.34

MFLX vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFLX and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFLXNFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

-0.58

+2.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.27

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.28

-0.09

Drawdowns

MFLX vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFLX drawdown since its inception was -26.76%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFLX and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFLXNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.76%

-47.67%

+20.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-16.14%

+13.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.18%

-21.55%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

-21.55%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

-17.45%

+13.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-9.58%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

6.12%

-5.35%

Volatility

MFLX vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) is 1.41%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that MFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFLXNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

4.58%

-3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

12.57%

-9.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

14.72%

-10.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

17.39%

-7.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.29%

20.72%

-9.43%

MFLX vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFLX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFLX vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

MFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than NFTY's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFLX
First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF
4.08%4.06%3.81%3.65%4.27%3.69%3.21%2.94%3.74%3.80%0.98%0.00%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.96%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFLX and NFTY have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFTY has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to MFLX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFLX dropped -26.76% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 5-year performance, NFTY leads with 4.62% vs -0.03% for MFLX. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, MFLX has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NFTY has performed better with a 4.62% return vs -0.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for MFLX.

MFLX has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 1.96% for NFTY.

MFLX is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for MFLX and 0.80% for NFTY.

MFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFLX and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer