PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFEKX vs. MISSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFEKX vs. MISSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) and MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund (MISSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEKX achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly higher than MISSX's 2.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MFEKX has outperformed MISSX with an annualized return of 17.81%, while MISSX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.63% annualized return.


MFEKX

1D
1.65%
1M
1.35%
YTD
5.30%
6M
5.10%
1Y
16.32%
3Y*
25.33%
5Y*
13.41%
10Y*
17.81%

MISSX

1D
0.11%
1M
2.11%
YTD
2.10%
6M
2.51%
1Y
7.86%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
1.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEKX vs. MISSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
5.30%12.44%49.62%36.27%-31.07%23.71%31.77%37.82%2.40%30.97%
MISSX
MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund
2.10%4.94%1.62%4.40%-10.37%1.95%4.25%6.82%1.04%4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MFEKX and MISSX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2011

-0.03

The correlation between MFEKX and MISSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFEKX vs. MISSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEKX
MFEKX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MFEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MISSX
MISSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MISSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MISSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MISSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MISSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MISSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEKX vs. MISSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) and MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund (MISSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFEKXMISSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.60

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

2.54

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.93

8.76

-5.83

MFEKX vs. MISSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the MISSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEKX and MISSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFEKX vs. MISSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEKX drawdown since its inception was -36.06%, which is greater than MISSX's maximum drawdown of -15.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEKX and MISSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFEKXMISSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.06%

-15.13%

-20.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.27%

-3.10%

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-6.56%

-16.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.06%

-15.13%

-20.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

-15.13%

-20.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

0.00%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-2.05%

-3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.35%

0.90%

+4.45%

Volatility

MFEKX vs. MISSX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund (MISSX) at 0.90%. This indicates that MFEKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MISSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFEKXMISSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

0.90%

+5.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

2.33%

+11.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.74%

3.21%

+13.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.01%

4.29%

+17.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.27%

4.11%

+17.16%

MFEKX vs. MISSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEKX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than MISSX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFEKX vs. MISSX - Dividend Comparison

MFEKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.07%, more than MISSX's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
14.07%14.82%25.31%4.82%1.04%2.74%3.55%1.57%3.88%2.49%1.70%3.64%
MISSX
MFS Mississippi Municipal Bond Fund
3.39%4.40%2.74%2.24%1.81%1.93%2.40%3.25%3.23%3.27%3.47%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFEKX and MISSX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEKX has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to MISSX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFEKX dropped -36.06% vs MISSX's -15.13%.

MISSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFEKX and MISSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer